On Friday 03 April 2015 10:42 PM, Russell King wrote:
clk_add_alias() is provided by clkdev, and is not part of the clk API.
Howver, it is prototyped in two locations: linux/clkdev.h and
linux/clk.h. This is a mess. Get rid of the redundant and unnecessary
version in linux/clk.h.
This message is generated daily by a cron job that builds media_tree for
the kernels and architectures in the list below.
Results of the daily build of media_tree:
date: Mon Apr 6 04:00:15 CEST 2015
git branch: test
git hash: a5562f65b1371a0988b707c10c44fcc2bba56990
gcc
Return a negative error code on failure.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// smpl
@@
identifier ret; expression e1,e2;
@@
(
if (\(ret 0\|ret != 0\))
{ ... return ret; }
|
ret = 0
)
... when != ret = e1
when !=
Return a negative error code on failure.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// smpl
@@
identifier ret; expression e1,e2;
@@
(
if (\(ret 0\|ret != 0\))
{ ... return ret; }
|
ret = 0
)
... when != ret = e1
when !=
The complate semantic patch that finds this problem is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// smpl
@ok exists@
identifier f,ret,i;
expression e;
constant c;
@@
// identify a function that returns a negative return value at least once.
f(...) {
... when any
(
return -c@i;
|
ret = -c@i;
...
Return a negative error code on failure.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// smpl
@@
identifier ret; expression e1,e2;
@@
(
if (\(ret 0\|ret != 0\))
{ ... return ret; }
|
ret = 0
)
... when != ret = e1
when !=
On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 11:04:56AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Russell,
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
Sorry for posting this soo close to the 4.1 merge window, I had
completely forgotten about this chunk of work I did
On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 12:44:35AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Russell,
Thank you for the patch;
On Friday 03 April 2015 18:12:58 Russell King wrote:
No merged platform supplies xclks via platform data. As we want to
slightly change the clkdev interface, rather than fixing this
Hi Russell,
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
Sorry for posting this soo close to the 4.1 merge window, I had
completely forgotten about this chunk of work I did earlier this
month.
The per-user struct clk patches rather badly broke clkdev
Hi Kassey,
Thanks for updating your patch and addressing my comments! In your reply
to v1 of this patch you said, that you would add DT support in v2, i.e. in
this version, right? Is it now present in this patch? If yes - can you
explain to me how it works? For I2C the
10 matches
Mail list logo
