On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 2:16 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> See: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/1/1/547
>
> Looks like you missed this when doing the merge :-(
Gaah. I noticed the actual conflicts, and then didn't actually notice
that there had been some other __poll_t
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 4:15 PM, Tony Luck wrote:
>
> Here there isn't any reason for speculation. The core has the
> value of 'x' in a register and the upper bound encoded into the
> "cmp" instruction. Both are right there, no waiting, no speculation.
So this is an
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 4:46 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> This series incorporates Mark Rutland's latest ARM changes and adds
> the x86 specific implementation of 'ifence_array_ptr'. That ifence
> based approach is provided as an opt-in fallback, but the default
>
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> Your patch considers TASKLET_SOFTIRQ being a candidate for 'immediate
> handling', but TCP Small queues heavily use TASKLET,
> so as far as I am concerned a revert would have the same effect.
Does it actually?
TCP ends
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 9:42 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
>
> On my preliminar tests, writing to a file on an ext4 partition at a
> USB stick loses data up to the point to make it useless (1/4 of the data
> is lost!). However, writing to a class 10 microSD card is
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 9:27 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> So yes, commit 4cd13c21b207 ("softirq: Let ksoftirqd do its job") has
> shown up multiple times in various 'regressions'
> simply because it could surface the problem more often.
> But even if you revert it, you can
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> Both dwc2_hsotg and ehci-hcd use the tasklets embedded in the
> giveback_urb_bh member of struct usb_hcd. See usb_hcd_giveback_urb()
> in drivers/usb/core/hcd.c; the calls are
>
> else if (high_prio_bh)
>
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 9:55 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> as I doubt we have enough time to root-case this properly.
Well, it's not like this is a new issue, and we don't have to get it
fixed for 4.15. It's been around since 4.9, it's not a "have to
suddenly fix it this week"
On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 11:54 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
>
> Em Sat, 6 Jan 2018 16:04:16 +0100
> "Josef Griebichler" escreveu:
>>
>> the causing commit has been identified.
>> After reverting commit
>>
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
>
> - The largest amount of fixes in this series is with regards to comments
> that aren't kernel-doc, but start with "/**". A new check added for
> 4.15 makes it to produce a *huge* amount of new warnings
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
>
> PS.: This time, there is a merge from staging tree, from the same commit
> you pulled on your tree, in order to solve a conflict at the
> atomisp driver, as reported by Stephen Rothwell.
Please
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mchehab/linux-media
> media/v4.14-2
No such tag.
Did you forget to push out? The latest tag I see is v4.14-1.
I do see the branch (v4l_for_linus) that
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 2:25 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> FIFO_MODE is an macro expression with a '<<' operator, which
> gcc points out could be misread as a '<':
Yeah, no, NAK again.
We don't make the code look worse just because gcc is being a f*cking
moron about things.
This
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> NAK. This takes unintentionally insane code and turns it intentionally
> insane. Any non-zero return is considered an error.
>
> The right fix is almost certainly to just return -E
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 2:25 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> - return capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) ? : -EINVAL;
> + return capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) ? 1 : -EINVAL;
NAK. This takes unintentionally insane code and turns it intentionally
insane. Any non-zero return is considered an
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> If that's the case, I'd prefer just turning off the format-truncation
> (but not overflow) warning with '-Wno-format-trunction".
Doing
KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warnin
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> The hwmon warnings are all about supporting no more than 9,999 sensors
> (applesmc) to 999,999,999 sensors (scpi) of a given type.
Yeah, I think that's enough.
> Easy "fix" would be to replace snprintf() with
[ Very random list of maintainers and mailing lists, at least
partially by number of warnings generated by gcc-7.1.1 that is then
correlated with the get_maintainers script ]
So I upgraded one of my boxes to F26, which upgraded the compiler to gcc-7.1.1
Which in turn means that my nice clean
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 7:41 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> BTW., instead of trying to avoid the scenario, wow about moving in the other
> direction: making CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ=y unconditional property in the IRQ core
> code
> starting from v4.12 or so
The problem is that it's
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 1:07 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> So, should we revert the hw-retrigger change:
>
> a9b4f08770b4 x86/ioapic: Restore IO-APIC irq_chip retrigger callback
>
> ... until we managed to fix CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ=y? If you'd like to revert it
> upstream straight
.
Linus
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> Added more relevant people. I've debugged the immediate problem below,
> but I think there's another problem that actually triggered this.
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:28 AM,
Added more relevant people. I've debugged the immediate problem below,
but I think there's another problem that actually triggered this.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:28 AM, kernel test robot
wrote:
>
> 0day kernel testing robot got the below dmesg and the first bad commit
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
>
> I did some research on Friday trying to identify where those images
> came. It turns that, for the oldest images (before I took the media
> maintainership), PDF were actually their "source", as far as I
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 9:55 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> I know it's unfashionable these days, but TeX always used to be bloody
> good at that kind of thing.
You must have used a different TeX than I did.
TeX is a horrible example. The moment you needed to insert
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> [adding Linus for clarification]
>
> I understood the concern as being about binary files that you cannot
> modify with classic 'patch', which is a separate issue.
No. That is how I *noticed* the issue. Those stupid pdf
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> No. That is how I *noticed* the issue. Those stupid pdf binary files
> have been around forever, I just didn't notice until the Fedora people
> started complaining about the patches.
Sid
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> Please merge these directly if you are happy with the result.
I will take this.
I do see two warnings, but they both seem to be valid and recent,
though, so I have no issues with the spurious cases.
Warning #1:
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 3:09 AM, Jörg Otte wrote:
>
> Tried patch with no success. Again a NULL ptr dereferece.
That patch was pure garbage, I think. Pretty much all the other
drivers that use the same approach will have the same issue. Adding
that init function just for the
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 7:40 AM, Jörg Otte wrote:
> Since v4.9-rc4 I get following crash in dvb-usb-cinergyT2 module.
Looks like it's commit 5ef8ed0e5608f ("[media] cinergyT2-core: don't
do DMA on stack"), which movced the DMA data array from the stack to
the "private"
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016, James Patrick-Evans wrote:
>
> The memory leak is caused by the probe function of the airspy driver
> mishandeling errors and not freeing the corresponding control structures when
> an error occours registering the device to v4l2 core.
The patch causes a warning about the
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> This patch changes all users of IS_ERR_VALUE() that I could find
> on 32-bit ARM randconfig builds and x86 allmodconfig. For the
> moment, this doesn't change the definition of IS_ERR_VALUE()
> because there are probably
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Morton
wrote:
>
> So you do plan to add some sort of typechecking into IS_ERR_VALUE()?
The easiest way to do it is to just turn the (x) into (unsigned
long)(void *)(x), which then complains about casting an integer to a
pointer
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
>
> --- a/drivers/media/media-device.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/media-device.c
> @@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ void __media_device_usb_init(struct medi
> const char *board_name,
>
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
>
> Just as a cross-check, this (incomplete, but au0828, cx231xx and em28xx
> aren't needed/ loaded on my system) crude revert avoids the problem for
> me on v4.6-rc6-113-g83858a7.
Hmm.
That just open-codes
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Hi
> [...]
>> Mauro Carvalho Chehab (95):
> [...]
>> [media] use v4l2_mc_usb_media_device_init() on most USB devices
> [...]
>
> This change, as part of v4.6-rc6-85-g1248ded, breaks two systems, each
> equipped
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
> Al Viro escreveu:
>
>> Take a look at this:
>> static unsigned int gsc_m2m_poll(struct file *file,
>> struct poll_table_struct *wait)
>> {
>>
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@osg.samsung.com wrote:
- Revert the IR encode patches, as the API is not mature enough.
So, better to postpone the changes to a latter Kernel;
What the hell have you done with the commit messages?
The first line
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de wrote:
Make all cache invalidation conditional on sg_has_page() and use
sg_phys to get the physical address directly.
So this worries me a bit (I'm just reacting to one random patch in the series).
The reason?
I think this wants
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de wrote:
+ for_each_sg(sg, s, nents, i) {
+ if (sg_has_page(s))
+ kmemcheck_mark_initialized(sg_virt(s), s-length);
+ }
[ Again, I'm responding to one random patch - this pattern was
It does seem like the error handling for mantis_dma_init() is insane..
Linus
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 5:12 PM, RUC_Soft_Sec zy900...@163.com wrote:
Summary:
there exists a wrong return value of function mantis_dma_init().It's a
theoretical problem. we use static analysis
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Sumit Semwal sumit.sem...@linaro.org wrote:
Could you please pull a few dma-buf changes for 3.20-rc1? Nothing
fancy, minor cleanups.
No.
I pulled, and immediately unpulled again.
This is complete shit, and the compiler even tells you so:
message --
From: Peter Kovář peter.ko...@reflexion.tv
Date: Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 2:18 PM
Subject: divide error: in the gspca_topro
To: Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org
Hi++ Linus!
There is a trivial bug in the gspca_topro webcam driver.
/* set the JPEG quality for sensor
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 1:26 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@osg.samsung.com wrote:
Please pull from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mchehab/linux-media
media/v3.19-4
That does not exist.
The tip of that linux-media tree does match the commit you claim is
the tip but
Yeah, this is pure crap. It doesn't even compile.
drivers/media/dvb-frontends/si2165.c:1063:17: error: expected ‘,’ or
‘;’ before ‘SI2165_FIRMWARE’
MODULE_FIRMWARE(SI2165_FIRMWARE);
because it should presumably say SI2165_FIRMWARE_REV_D now.
Why the f*ck do you send me totally untested
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@osg.samsung.com wrote:
PS.: FYI, I'm now starting to use mche...@osg.samsung.com e-mail address.
The old one (m.che...@samsung.com) is still valid, but we're using the
OSG subdomain for the Samsung's Open Source Group.
Thanks for
Brian, please use
./scripts/get_maintainer -f drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb-v2/rtl28xxu.c
to get the proper people to send this to, so that it doesn't get lost
in the flood in lkml.
The indentation of that new entry also seems to be suspect, in that it
doesn't match the ones around it.
Quoting
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
m.che...@samsung.com wrote:
PS.: You'll find some minor conflicts between this changeset and upstream,
mainly due to some code that moved from V4L2 to OF subsystem.
That conflict was not at all minor, unless I were willing to do the
merge
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
m.che...@samsung.com wrote:
Please pull from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mchehab/linux-media
v4l_for_linus
Oh, just noticed that this seems to be the cause of a new annoying warning:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Here is a simple test case for this problem:
== anon-union.c ==
struct s {
union {
int val;
};
};
static struct s foo = { .val = 5, };
Ok, this fixes the warning, but we
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 1:06 AM, Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Running sparse over this gives:
error: bad integer constant expression
So technically sparse is correct in this case. The kernel ends up
doing some questionable things that gcc allows. The index in an
assignment
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:03 AM, Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote:
which is clearly a sparse bug somewhere.
Yes. What is going on is that we create separate symbols for each
declaration, and we tie them all together (and warn if they have
conflicting types).
But then when we look up a
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
I'll think about how to fix it cleanly. Expect a patch shortly.
Ok, patch sent to linux-sparse mailing list. It fixes the particular
cut-down test-case and seems pretty simple and straightforward
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 5:57 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
m.che...@samsung.com wrote:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mchehab/linux-media
for you to fetch changes up to 57f0547fbc1e925f5e58c76f311a6632c3f37740:
Grr. You missed the branch name.
I can see from the SHA1 (and
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
m.che...@samsung.com wrote:
Also, a trivial conflict at s5p_mfc_dec.c and s5p_mfc_enc.c will happen as
a macro name got renamed from IS_MFCV6 to IS_MFCV6_PLUS.
I did an ugly merge when fixing that conflict up, because the stupid
code at the
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Knut Petersen
knut_peter...@t-online.de wrote:
Hi Linus!
It would be nice to have head cx88fix of
git.linuxtv.org/hverkuil/media_tree.git
(git.linuxtv.org/hverkuil/media_tree.git/commit/5dce3635bf803cfe9dde84e00f5f9594439e6c02)
in 3.11 as it is a trivial and
Jörg - does current git work for you? It has a patch from Rafael that
just reverts the insane error code, and fixed something very similar
for him.
(I just pushed out, so it might take a few minutes to mirror out to
the public sites).
Linus
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Jörg
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote:
If that unfortunate module_init() lockup can't be solved properly in
the kernel
Stop this idiocy.
The kernel doesn't have a lockup problem. udev does.
As even you admit, it is *udev* that has the whole serialization
issue, and
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Yes. The issue was noticed with media drivers when people started using the
drivers on Fedora 17, witch came with udev-182. There's an open
bugzilla there:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
Anyway. Attached is a really stupid patch that tries to do the direct
firmware load as suggested by Ivan. It has not been tested very
extensively at all (but I did test that it loaded the brcmsmac
firmware
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Al Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk wrote:
+ if (!S_ISREG(inode-i_mode))
+ return false;
+ size = i_size_read(inode);
Probably better to do vfs_getattr() and check mode and size in kstat; if
it's sufficiently hot for that to hurt, we
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote:
Nothing really breaks, It's slow and it will surely be fixed when
we know what's the right fix, which we haven't sorted out at this
moment.
A thirty-second pause at bootup is easily long enough that some people
might think the
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov
kir...@shutemov.name wrote:
AFAIK, accessing files on filesystem form kernel directly was no-go for a
long time. What's the new rule here?
Oh, we've *always* accessed files from the kernel.
What we don't want is random drivers doing so
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
Ok, like this?
This looks good to me. Having udev do firmware loading and tieing it to
the driver model may have not been such a good idea so many years ago.
Doing it this way makes more sense.
Ok, I wish this had
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Lucas De Marchi
lucas.de.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
So maintaining the fallback or adding a configurable entry to set the
firmware paths might be good.
Yeah, I do think we need to make it configurable. Probably both at
kernel compile time and dynamically.
The aim
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Andy Walls awa...@md.metrocast.net wrote:
I don't know if you can remove the /sys/.../firmware ABI altogether, because
there is at least one, somewhat popular udev replacement that also uses it:
mdev
http://git.busybox.net/busybox/plain/docs/mdev.txt
Heh.
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Ming Lei ming@canonical.com wrote:
Yes, the patch will make firmware cache not working, I would like to fix
that when I return from one trip next week.
BTW, firmware cache is still needed even direct loading is taken.
I agree 100%, I'd have liked to do the
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
I basically tried a few different approaches, including deferred probe(),
as you suggested, and request_firmware_async(), as Kay suggested.
Stop this crazy. FIX UDEV ALREADY, DAMMIT.
Who maintains udev these days?
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Ivan Kalvachev ikalvac...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not kernel developer and probably my opinion would be a little
naive, but here it is.
Please, make the kernel load firmware from the filesystem on its own.
We probably should do that, not just for firmware, but
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
which went into udev release 187 which I think corresponds to the place
when people started having problems, right Mauro?
According to what I've seen, people started complaining in 182, not 187.
See for example
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Jiri Kosina jkos...@suse.cz wrote:
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012, Linus Torvalds wrote:
And see this email from Kay Sievers that shows that it was all known
about and intentional in the udev camp:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg185742.html
This seems
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Sumit Semwal sumit.sem...@linaro.org wrote:
I am really sorry - I goofed up in the git URL (sent the ssh URL
instead).
I was going to send you an acerbic email asking for your private ssh
key, but then noticed that you had sent another email with the public
Btw, I only noticed now, because I normally don't build DVB on my main
machine with oldconfig - why the hell does DVB add tuners with
default m?
Why would *anybody* with an old config ever want to get those new
drivers as modules?
Get rid of all the stupid
default m if DVB_FE_CUSTOMISE
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
The Kconfig default for DVB_FE_CUSTOMISE is 'n'. So, if no DVB bridge is
selected,
nothing will be compiled.
Sadly, it looks like the default for distro kernels is 'y'.
Which means that if you start with a
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 10:23 AM, tdent48...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Tracey tj@tj-HP-2000-Notebook-PC.(none)
Please fix your git config to have proper name and email (or whatever
tool you used). Your 'cc' list is similarly broken.
Either selecting or depending on the
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
For a simpler solution, we could keep the old warning message, but change
the logic from
(.compat_ioctl == NULL || .compat_ioctl() == -ENOIOCTL) (no generic
handler)
to
(.ioctl != NULL .compat_ioctl == NULL) (no
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
Just fix the *obvious* breakage in BLKROSET. It's clearly what the
code *intends* to do, it just didn't check for ENOIOCTLCMD.
So it seems from quick grepping that the block layer isn't actually
all
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
Added, linux-media and Mauro to the Cc, because I'm about to commit
something like the attached patch to see if anything breaks. We may
have to revert it if things get too nasty, but we should have done
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Of course, since vfs_ioctl does the same thing this is clearly isn't some
isolated V4L thing. Pot. Kettle.
Oh, absolutely. V4L is not at all the only confused user around.
The EINVAL thing goes way back, and is a
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote:
No, what we do is perfectly consistent: i.e. we always return EINVAL when an
ioctl is not supported. That's what 'consistent' means. Whether that is the
*right* error code is something else.
You don't even understand the
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
We should be able to handle the case where scancode is valid even though
it might be unmapped yet. This is regardless of what version of
EVIOCGKEYCODE we use, 1 or 2, and whether it is sparse keymap or not.
Is
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, another issue is that evdev's ioctl returns -EINVAL for unknown
ioctls so applications would have hard time figuring out whether error
returned because of kernel being too old or because they are trying to
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
See, it will only look into the 16-bits scancode space. There are several
remote
controllers with 24 bits and 32 bits, so the tool is already broken anyway.
Mauro, stop blathering.
The problem is that the tool
Hi Marcos,
[ full email quoted for new cc's ]
you really would be much better off sending a diff rather than trying
to explain what changes you did, but quite frankly, even if you did
that, I'd still want this to go through the actual maintainers of the
em28xx driver.
The USB error sounds like
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
The following changes since commit 32163f4b2cef28a5aab8b226ffecfc6379a53786:
alpha: fix usp value in multithreaded coredumps (2010-09-25 14:38:13 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Chicken Shack wrote:
This is a SCANDAL, not fun! This is SCANDALOUS!
I agree that this whole thread has been totally inappropriate from
beginning to end.
On all sides, btw. I would suggest that somebody who can't even use his
own name should be the last to complain
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
are available in the git repository at:
ssh://linuxtv.org/git/fixes.git v4l_for_linus
I don't have ssh access to that thing, and git:// doesn't work.
You probably meant
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Chicken Shack wrote:
...
Please stop emailing me. I'm simply not interested in your political
troubles with the DVB people.
I see with my own eyes why people have issues with your way of
communication, and quite frankly, I'm not interested in discussing
name-calling
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, Tejun Heo wrote:
Do you think that usage is wide-spread? Implementing strict ordering
shouldn't be too difficult but I can't help but feeling that such
assumption is abuse of implementation detail.
I think it would be good if it were more than an implementation detail,
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Tejun Heo wrote:
I might have been too early with the 'easy' part but I definitely can
give it a shot. What do you think about the scheduler notifier
implementation? It seems we'll end up with three callbacks. It can
either be three hlist_heads in the struct_task
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Please pull from:
ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mchehab/linux-2.6.git
for_linus
Already up-to-date.
Forgot to push?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, Krzysztof Helt wrote:
Who should I send this patch to be included as a 2.6.31 regression fix?
Just send the patches to me. I've got the patch, but no changelog, and so
I'd like to see them again, with changelogs and the proper Acked-by: or
Tested-by lines etc.
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, Paul Mundt wrote:
Why not lock as well?
I had that initially, but matroxfb will break if we do that, and
presently nothing cares about trying to take -lock that early on.
I really would rather have consistency than some odd rules like that.
In particular - if
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, Paul Mundt wrote:
Ok, here is an updated version with an updated matroxfb and the sm501fb
change reverted.
Wu Zhangjin, can you also confirm that this works for you (without your
patch)?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Please pull from:
ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mchehab/linux-2.6.git
for_linus
Have you rebased your tree and pushed out multiple versions of it?
I'm getting very confusing things from the mirrors, which are
94 matches
Mail list logo