IMHO, the best is to get the latest firmware licensed is the best
thing to do.
Does that new xc5000c come with a firmware pre-loaded already?
I've got firmware here that is indicated as being for the xc5300 (i.e.
0x14b4). That said, I am not sure if it's the same as the original
5000c
I just received a confirmation, that firmware in file
latest-dvb-fe-xc5000c-0.6.30.5.fw is working.
xc5000: Firmware latest-dvb-fe-xc5000c-0.6.30.5.fw loaded and running
xc5000: *** HW: V6.0, FW: V 0.6.40990
So, it's has a build number 40990
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
IMHO, the best is to get the latest firmware licensed is the best
thing to do.
Does that new xc5000c come with a firmware pre-loaded already?
I've got firmware here that is indicated as being for the xc5300 (i.e.
0x14b4). That said, I am not sure if it's the same as the original
5000c
Here is a link on a chinese site with datasheet for xc5100.
http://wenku.baidu.com/view/7f92f3fe700abb68a982fb96.html
If you look at it, after reading Product ID we also should receive
0x14b4 (5300 decimal)
I'll try extract a FW from a Windows driver and will share results,
in case of success.
It's not new IC. It's XC5000C. Maybe i was interpreted wrong.
As I have understood, such behaviour can depends from FW version.
HW vendor says, that with his latest FW he always gets response 0x14b4.
Ah, so you're running a completely different firmware image? Well in
that case that would
Correct. These are not parts that have any form of default firmware
in their ROM mask (i.e. not like the silabs or micronas parts which
have a default firmware and the ability to patch the ROM via a
software loaded code update). The firmware must be loaded every time
the chip is brought out of
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
To: Unembossed Name
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org; Devin Heitmueller
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: XC5000C 0x14b4 status
After that RF tuner identification became always successful.
I had a conversation with a hardware vendor.
Now I can say
IMHO, the best is to get the latest firmware licensed is the best
thing to do.
Does that new xc5000c come with a firmware pre-loaded already?
I've got firmware here that is indicated as being for the xc5300 (i.e.
0x14b4). That said, I am not sure if it's the same as the original
5000c
Hi,
I was working on a Linux driver for a hybrid TV-tuner with SAA7134 PCI bridge,
XC5000C RF tuner and Si2168 DVB demodulator by a
combining all existent at that time drivers together.
During that work, I had an issue with XC5000C.
Episodically, after attaching to DVB and reading
From: Antti Palosaari
To: Unembossed Name severe.siberian@mail.ru;
linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 10:22 PM
Subject: Re: About Si2168 Part, Revision and ROM detection.
Also, I would like to suggest a following naming method for files
containing firmware patches
From: Antti Palosaari
To: Unembossed Name severe.siberian@mail.ru;
linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 6:46 AM
Subject: Re: About Si2168 Part, Revision and ROM detection.
And at the same time, he was able to successfully upload firmware patch,
that
designed for A30
From: Antti Palosaari
To: Unembossed Name severe.siberian@mail.ru;
linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 6:46 AM
Subject: Re: About Si2168 Part, Revision and ROM detection.
Also, I would like to suggest a following naming method for files
containing firmware patches
Hi Hurda,
What's new with that firmware?
It's twice as big as 4.0.11, so there got to be a lot of changes and fixes.
I can't tell exactly what 4.0.19 does. May be I'm wrong, but I suppose, patch
4.0.19
for B40 has so big size, because most likely it resolves the same issues as
patch 3.0.20
From: Antti Palosaari
To: Unembossed Name
Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2015 12:43 AM
Subject: Re: Si2168 B40 frimware.
Anybody want to test it? Unfortunately, I can not do it myself, because
I do not own hardware with B40 revision.
That does not even download. It looks like 17 byte chunk format
From: Antti Palosaari
To: Unembossed Name severe.siberian@mail.ru;
linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2015 3:14 AM
Subject: Re: Si2168 B40 frimware.
Could you please check it again? And in case of success see which
version it is?
file name:dvb-demod-si2168-b40-rom4_0_2
Hi,
Yesterday I extracted a new firmware for Si2168 B40 rev. from Windows
driver.
It's designed for ROM version 4.0.2 and has a version build 4.0.19
Here is a name of
file:dvb-demod-si2168-b40-rom4_0_2-patch-build4_0_19.fw.tar.gz
And a link for download:
Hi,
Information below was given by a hardware vendor, who uses these demodulators on their dvb-t2 products. As an explanation on our
questions for Si2168 Linux driver development.
I think it can give more clue with Part, Revision and ROM detection algorithm
in Linux driver for that
17 matches
Mail list logo
