Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@infradead.org writes:
Em 02-06-2010 18:09, Andrew Morton escreveu:
On Sun, 30 May 2010 14:29:55 GMT
bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16077
2.6.33 - 2.6.34 performance regression in dvb webcam frame rates.
Hi,
On 06/03/2010 09:03 AM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Mauro Carvalho Chehabmche...@infradead.org writes:
Em 02-06-2010 18:09, Andrew Morton escreveu:
On Sun, 30 May 2010 14:29:55 GMT
bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16077
2.6.33 - 2.6.34
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com writes:
I notice in the original bug report that you claim that the lower framerate
clip with 2.6.34 has much better quality, could you define this a bit
better.
Sorry for the confusion, but this wasn't me. I just read the bug report.
Bjørn
--
To
On Sun, 30 May 2010 14:29:55 GMT
bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16077
2.6.33 - 2.6.34 performance regression in dvb webcam frame rates.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to
Em 02-06-2010 18:09, Andrew Morton escreveu:
On Sun, 30 May 2010 14:29:55 GMT
bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16077
2.6.33 - 2.6.34 performance regression in dvb webcam frame rates.
I don't think this is a regression. Probably, the
