Re: [Mesa-dev] [RFC] New dma_buf -> EGLImage EGL extension - Final spec published!

2016-08-30 Thread Rob Clark
Tom, hmm, I wonder if it was a bug/oversight for the YUV capabilities of this extension to not depend on OES_EGL_image_external (which unfortunately, doesn't seem to have a GL counterpart)? I think this currently implies that you could sample from an imported YUV eglimg using (for example)

Re: [Mesa-dev] [RFC] New dma_buf -> EGLImage EGL extension - Final spec published!

2016-06-20 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 09:45:26 -0400 Rob Clark wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:44:34 -0400 > > Rob Clark wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Pekka Paalanen

Re: [Mesa-dev] [RFC] New dma_buf -> EGLImage EGL extension - Final spec published!

2016-06-20 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:44:34 -0400 > Rob Clark wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: >> > On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:26:04 -0400 >> > Rob Clark

Re: [Mesa-dev] [RFC] New dma_buf -> EGLImage EGL extension - Final spec published!

2016-06-20 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:44:34 -0400 Rob Clark wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:26:04 -0400 > > Rob Clark wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:59 AM, Pekka Paalanen

Re: [Mesa-dev] [RFC] New dma_buf -> EGLImage EGL extension - Final spec published!

2016-06-20 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:44:34 -0400 Rob Clark wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:26:04 -0400 > > Rob Clark wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:59 AM, Pekka Paalanen

Re: [Mesa-dev] [RFC] New dma_buf -> EGLImage EGL extension - Final spec published!

2016-06-17 Thread Rob Clark
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:26:04 -0400 > Rob Clark wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:59 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: >> > On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:40:51 -0400 >> > Rob Clark

Re: [Mesa-dev] [RFC] New dma_buf -> EGLImage EGL extension - Final spec published!

2016-06-17 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:26:04 -0400 Rob Clark wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:59 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:40:51 -0400 > > Rob Clark wrote: > > > >> So, if we wanted to extend this to support the

Re: [Mesa-dev] [RFC] New dma_buf -> EGLImage EGL extension - Final spec published!

2016-06-17 Thread Rob Clark
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:59 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:40:51 -0400 > Rob Clark wrote: > >> So, if we wanted to extend this to support the fourcc-modifiers that >> we have on the kernel side for compressed/tiled/etc formats, what

Re: [Mesa-dev] [RFC] New dma_buf -> EGLImage EGL extension - Final spec published!

2016-06-17 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:40:51 -0400 Rob Clark wrote: > So, if we wanted to extend this to support the fourcc-modifiers that > we have on the kernel side for compressed/tiled/etc formats, what > would be the right approach? > > A new version of the existing extension or a new

Re: [Mesa-dev] [RFC] New dma_buf -> EGLImage EGL extension - Final spec published!

2016-06-16 Thread Rob Clark
So, if we wanted to extend this to support the fourcc-modifiers that we have on the kernel side for compressed/tiled/etc formats, what would be the right approach? A new version of the existing extension or a new EGL_EXT_image_dma_buf_import2 extension, or ?? BR, -R On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 6:54