On Fri, 9 Sep 2016, Andrey Utkin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 10:31:30PM +0800, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > Will this soon reach linux-next?
>
> No idea. Indeed it's simpler if you leave your patch as is, and then
> later we patch this new driver separately.
OK, thanks.
julia
--
To
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 10:31:30PM +0800, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Will this soon reach linux-next?
No idea. Indeed it's simpler if you leave your patch as is, and then
later we patch this new driver separately.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of
On Fri, 9 Sep 2016, Andrey Utkin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 01:59:18AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > Check for vb2_ops structures that are only stored in the ops field of a
> > vb2_queue structure. That field is declared const, so vb2_ops structures
> > that have this property can be
On 9 September 2016 12:34:57 EEST, Julia Lawall wrote:
>Do you want the whole patch again, or would a patch on the new driver
>by itself be sufficient? The changes in the different files are all
>independent.
I guess maintainers would want a single patch for everything in
Le 09.09.2016 17:17, Andrey Utkin a écrit :
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 01:59:18AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
Check for vb2_ops structures that are only stored in the ops field of
a
vb2_queue structure. That field is declared const, so vb2_ops
structures
that have this property can be declared
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 01:59:18AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Check for vb2_ops structures that are only stored in the ops field of a
> vb2_queue structure. That field is declared const, so vb2_ops structures
> that have this property can be declared as const also.
> Signed-off-by: Julia
Check for vb2_ops structures that are only stored in the ops field of a
vb2_queue structure. That field is declared const, so vb2_ops structures
that have this property can be declared as const also.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
//
@r