On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Devin Heitmueller
devin.heitmuel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Frank Dischner
phaedrus...@googlemail.com wrote:
While I'm at it, I thought I'd go ahead and make a patch to remove the
top bits from the vsb table, but I've got a question
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Tim Mester ttmest...@gmail.com wrote:
From my experience it seems that 2 in 0x2005 resets the 8522 demod.
All demod register setting appear to be lost after accessing any
registers in the 0x2xxx range (you really, just that bit needs to be
set on a i2c bus
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Devin Heitmueller
dheitmuel...@kernellabs.com wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Tim Mester ttmest...@gmail.com wrote:
From my experience it seems that 2 in 0x2005 resets the 8522 demod.
All demod register setting appear to be lost after accessing any
Hi Devin,
Do you have the USB trace you used as the basis for this dump? And
did you programatically parse that dump to generate the table, or did
you enter it by hand? Could you please email me the underlying dump
so I can double check the data?
I wrote a program to parse the trace and
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Frank Dischner
phaedrus...@googlemail.com wrote:
While I'm at it, I thought I'd go ahead and make a patch to remove the
top bits from the vsb table, but I've got a question about that. I
think the first four entries are unnecessary. I'm pretty sure 8090 and
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Frank Dischner
phaedrus...@googlemail.com wrote:
Here's the updated patch with the requested changes.
Frank
Hello Frank,
Sorry for taking so long to get back to this.
I looked at the patch, and in particular, I compared the values
programmed for QAM256
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Frank Dischner
phaedrus...@googlemail.com wrote:
Here's the updated patch with the requested changes.
Frank
Thanks,
Devin
--
Devin J. Heitmueller
http://www.devinheitmueller.com
AIM: devinheitmueller
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Here's the updated patch with the requested changes.
Frank
Signed-off-by: Frank Dischner phaedrus...@gmail.com
diff -urN v4l-dvb/linux/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/au8522_dig.c
v4l-dvb.new/linux/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/au8522_dig.c
--- v4l-dvb/linux/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/au8522_dig.c
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 20:07 -0500, Britney Fransen wrote:
I have updated the patch from
http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2008-December/030786.html
to add QAM64 support to the HVR-950Q. It is working well for me.
What needs to happen to get this included in v4l-dvb?
Well, one
I'm the original author of the patch. I included a Signed-off-by:
line when I submitted it (see the email Britney linked to). As far as
I can tell, the only modification to the patch is the file it is
applied to. This is exactly what I did after analog support was
merged, but I never submitted it
On Apr 30, 2009, at 8:55 PM, Frank Dischner wrote:
As far as
I can tell, the only modification to the patch is the file it is
applied to.
Frank, you are correct. The only change I made was to the new _dig.c
file that I believe changed with analog support. Do you want to
resubmit the
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Britney Fransen
britney.fran...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 30, 2009, at 8:55 PM, Frank Dischner wrote:
As far as
I can tell, the only modification to the patch is the file it is
applied to.
Frank, you are correct. The only change I made was to the new _dig.c
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Britney Fransen
britney.fran...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 30, 2009, at 8:55 PM, Frank Dischner wrote:
As far as
I can tell, the only modification to the patch is the file it is
applied to.
Frank, you are correct. The only change I made was to the new _dig.c
13 matches
Mail list logo
