On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Andy Walls awa...@md.metrocast.net wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 09:22 -0300, Gonzalo de la Vega wrote:
The tunner IF for PAL-Nc norm, which AFAIK is used only in Argentina, was
being defined as equal to PAL-M but it is not. It actually uses the same
video IF
Buenos dias Gonzalo,
Em 20-04-2012 11:01, Gonzalo A. de la Vega escreveu:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Andy Walls awa...@md.metrocast.net wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 09:22 -0300, Gonzalo de la Vega wrote:
The tunner IF for PAL-Nc norm, which AFAIK is used only in Argentina, was
being
Hola ;)
From other discussions we've had at the ML, it seems that devices sold in
Argentina with analog tuners sometimes come with a NTSC tuner, and sometimes
come with an European PAL tuner. They solve the frequency shifts that
happen there via some tda9887 (and/or tuner-simple)
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 11:01 -0300, Gonzalo A. de la Vega wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Andy Walls awa...@md.metrocast.net wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 09:22 -0300, Gonzalo de la Vega wrote:
The tunner IF for PAL-Nc norm, which AFAIK is used only in Argentina, was
being defined as
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 09:22 -0300, Gonzalo de la Vega wrote:
The tunner IF for PAL-Nc norm, which AFAIK is used only in Argentina, was
being defined as equal to PAL-M but it is not. It actually uses the same
video IF as PAL-BG (and unlike PAL-M) but the audio is at 4.5MHz (same as
PAL-M). A
The tunner IF for PAL-Nc norm, which AFAIK is used only in Argentina, was being
defined as equal to PAL-M but it is not. It actually uses the same video IF as
PAL-BG (and unlike PAL-M) but the audio is at 4.5MHz (same as PAL-M). A
separate structure member was added for PAL-Nc.
Signed-off-by:
