Hi Antti
2011/7/23 Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi:
On 07/23/2011 02:01 AM, HoP wrote:
2011/7/23 Antti Palosaaricr...@iki.fi:
On 07/23/2011 01:47 AM, HoP wrote:
2011/7/23 Antti Palosaaricr...@iki.fi:
On 07/23/2011 01:18 AM, HoP wrote:
In case of i2c write operation there is only one
On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 01:47 +0200, HoP wrote:
2011/7/23 Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi:
On 07/23/2011 02:31 AM, Antti Palosaari wrote:
On 07/23/2011 02:01 AM, HoP wrote:
2011/7/23 Antti Palosaaricr...@iki.fi:
But now I see what you mean. msg2[1] is set as garbage fields in case of
2011/7/23 Malcolm Priestley tvbox...@gmail.com:
On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 01:47 +0200, HoP wrote:
2011/7/23 Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi:
On 07/23/2011 02:31 AM, Antti Palosaari wrote:
On 07/23/2011 02:01 AM, HoP wrote:
2011/7/23 Antti Palosaaricr...@iki.fi:
But now I see what you
In case of i2c write operation there is only one element in msg[] array.
Don't access msg[1] in that case.
Signed-off-by: Honza Petrous jpetr...@smartimp.cz
--
diff -uBbp cxd2820r_core.c.orig cxd2820r_core.c
--- cxd2820r_core.c.orig2011-07-22 23:31:56.319168405 +0200
+++ cxd2820r_core.c
2011/7/23 Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi:
On 07/23/2011 01:18 AM, HoP wrote:
In case of i2c write operation there is only one element in msg[] array.
Don't access msg[1] in that case.
NACK.
I suspect you confuse now local msg2 and msg that is passed as function
parameter. Could you double
On 07/23/2011 01:47 AM, HoP wrote:
2011/7/23 Antti Palosaaricr...@iki.fi:
On 07/23/2011 01:18 AM, HoP wrote:
In case of i2c write operation there is only one element in msg[] array.
Don't access msg[1] in that case.
NACK.
I suspect you confuse now local msg2 and msg that is passed as
2011/7/23 Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi:
On 07/23/2011 01:47 AM, HoP wrote:
2011/7/23 Antti Palosaaricr...@iki.fi:
On 07/23/2011 01:18 AM, HoP wrote:
In case of i2c write operation there is only one element in msg[] array.
Don't access msg[1] in that case.
NACK.
I suspect you confuse now
On 07/23/2011 02:01 AM, HoP wrote:
2011/7/23 Antti Palosaaricr...@iki.fi:
On 07/23/2011 01:47 AM, HoP wrote:
2011/7/23 Antti Palosaaricr...@iki.fi:
On 07/23/2011 01:18 AM, HoP wrote:
In case of i2c write operation there is only one element in msg[] array.
Don't access msg[1] in that case.
On 07/23/2011 02:31 AM, Antti Palosaari wrote:
On 07/23/2011 02:01 AM, HoP wrote:
2011/7/23 Antti Palosaaricr...@iki.fi:
But now I see what you mean. msg2[1] is set as garbage fields in case of
incoming msg len is 1. True, but it does not harm since it is not
used in
that case.
In case of
2011/7/23 Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi:
On 07/23/2011 02:31 AM, Antti Palosaari wrote:
On 07/23/2011 02:01 AM, HoP wrote:
2011/7/23 Antti Palosaaricr...@iki.fi:
But now I see what you mean. msg2[1] is set as garbage fields in case of
incoming msg len is 1. True, but it does not harm since
10 matches
Mail list logo
