On Wednesday 22 July 2009 13:59:00 Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 July 2009 02:51:12 Trent Piepho wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Jarod Wilson wrote:
...
> > > So its either I have *two* machines with bad, but only slightly bad,
> > > and in the same way, PCI slots which seem to work fine wi
On Wednesday 22 July 2009 02:51:12 Trent Piepho wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 July 2009 10:23:53 Steven Toth wrote:
> > > > Hrm, okay, I'll double-check that... If its not there, perhaps the card
> > > > isn't quite seated correctly. Or the machine is bunk. Or
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Steven Toth wrote:
> On 7/21/09 9:48 PM, Bob Hepple wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:35:47 -0400
>> Jarod Wilson wrote:
>>
>>> So its either I have *two* machines with bad, but only slightly bad,
>>> and in the same way, PCI slots which seem to work fine with a
On 7/21/09 9:48 PM, Bob Hepple wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:35:47 -0400
Jarod Wilson wrote:
So its either I have *two* machines with bad, but only slightly bad,
and in the same way, PCI slots which seem to work fine with any other
card I have (uh, unlikely),
... not unlikely if the two mach
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 23:51 -0700, Trent Piepho wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 July 2009 10:23:53 Steven Toth wrote:
> > > > Hrm, okay, I'll double-check that... If its not there, perhaps the card
> > > > isn't quite seated correctly. Or the machine is bunk. Or
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 July 2009 10:23:53 Steven Toth wrote:
> > > Hrm, okay, I'll double-check that... If its not there, perhaps the card
> > > isn't quite seated correctly. Or the machine is bunk. Or the card has
> > > gone belly up. Amusing that it works as much
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:35:47 -0400
Jarod Wilson wrote:
> So its either I have *two* machines with bad, but only slightly bad,
> and in the same way, PCI slots which seem to work fine with any other
> card I have (uh, unlikely),
... not unlikely if the two machines are similar - many motherboard
On Tuesday 21 July 2009 10:23:53 Steven Toth wrote:
> > Hrm, okay, I'll double-check that... If its not there, perhaps the card
> > isn't quite seated correctly. Or the machine is bunk. Or the card has
> > gone belly up. Amusing that it works as much as it does though, if any
> > of the above is th
Hrm, okay, I'll double-check that... If its not there, perhaps the card
isn't quite seated correctly. Or the machine is bunk. Or the card has
gone belly up. Amusing that it works as much as it does though, if any
of the above is the case...
Thanks for the info!
Jrod,
Yeah. If the pci enable b
On Monday 20 July 2009 15:51:27 Trent Piepho wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jul 2009, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > The dvb side of the pcHDTV HD-3000 doesn't work since at least 2.6.29.
> > The crux of the problem is this: the HD-3000's device ID matches the
> > modalias for the cx8800 driver, but not the cx8802 d
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> The dvb side of the pcHDTV HD-3000 doesn't work since at least 2.6.29.
> The crux of the problem is this: the HD-3000's device ID matches the
> modalias for the cx8800 driver, but not the cx8802 driver, which is
> required to set up the digital side of the
The dvb side of the pcHDTV HD-3000 doesn't work since at least 2.6.29.
The crux of the problem is this: the HD-3000's device ID matches the
modalias for the cx8800 driver, but not the cx8802 driver, which is
required to set up the digital side of the card. You can load up
cx8802 just fine, but cx88
12 matches
Mail list logo
