On 02/05/2014 10:44 PM, Dean Anderson wrote:
> On 2014-02-04 04:04, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> Hi Dean,
>>
>> On 02/03/14 18:06, Dean Anderson wrote:
>>> On 2014-02-03 03:51, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi Dean,
Some specific comments below, but first two general comments:
It is easier
On 2014-02-04 04:04, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi Dean,
On 02/03/14 18:06, Dean Anderson wrote:
On 2014-02-03 03:51, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi Dean,
Some specific comments below, but first two general comments:
It is easier to review if at least the removal of the old s2255_fh
struct
was done as a s
On 2014-02-04 04:04, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi Dean,
On 02/03/14 18:06, Dean Anderson wrote:
On 2014-02-03 03:51, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi Dean,
Some specific comments below, but first two general comments:
It is easier to review if at least the removal of the old s2255_fh
struct
was done as a s
Hi Dean,
On 02/03/14 18:06, Dean Anderson wrote:
> On 2014-02-03 03:51, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> Hi Dean,
>>
>> Some specific comments below, but first two general comments:
>>
>> It is easier to review if at least the removal of the old s2255_fh struct
>> was done as a separate patch. It's always g
Hi Dean,
Some specific comments below, but first two general comments:
It is easier to review if at least the removal of the old s2255_fh struct
was done as a separate patch. It's always good to try and keep the changes
in patches as small as possible. The actual vb2 conversion is always a
'big b
