On Saturday 31 October 2009 10:13:22 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:36:37 +0200
>
> Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
> > On Monday 05 October 2009 15:48:17 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > Upcoming I2C v4l2_subdev drivers need a way to control the subdevice
> > > power state from th
Em Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:36:37 +0200
Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
> On Monday 05 October 2009 15:48:17 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Upcoming I2C v4l2_subdev drivers need a way to control the subdevice
> > power state from the core. This use case is already partially covered by
> > the tuner s_standby
On Monday 12 October 2009 00:36:37 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Monday 05 October 2009 15:48:17 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Upcoming I2C v4l2_subdev drivers need a way to control the subdevice
> > power state from the core. This use case is already partially covered by
> > the tuner s_standby opera
On Monday 05 October 2009 15:48:17 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Upcoming I2C v4l2_subdev drivers need a way to control the subdevice
> power state from the core. This use case is already partially covered by
> the tuner s_standby operation, but no way to explicitly come back from
> the standby state i
Upcoming I2C v4l2_subdev drivers need a way to control the subdevice
power state from the core. This use case is already partially covered by
the tuner s_standby operation, but no way to explicitly come back from
the standby state is available.
Rename the tuner s_standby operation to core s_power,
