Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix ir-rx51 by using PWM pdata

* Ivaylo Dimitrov [160430 10:53]: > Hi, > > On 29.04.2016 00:27, Tony Lindgren wrote: > >* Ivaylo Dimitrov [160428 14:21]: > >> > >>I didn't test legacy boot, as I don't really see any value of doing it now > >>the end of the legacy boot

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix ir-rx51 by using PWM pdata

Hi, On 29.04.2016 00:27, Tony Lindgren wrote: * Ivaylo Dimitrov [160428 14:21]: I didn't test legacy boot, as I don't really see any value of doing it now the end of the legacy boot is near, the driver does not function correctly, however the patchset at least

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix ir-rx51 by using PWM pdata

* Ivaylo Dimitrov [160428 14:21]: > > I didn't test legacy boot, as I don't really see any value of doing it now > the end of the legacy boot is near, the driver does not function correctly, > however the patchset at least allows for the driver to be build and we

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix ir-rx51 by using PWM pdata

Hi, On 27.04.2016 02:51, Tony Lindgren wrote: Hi all, Here are minimal fixes to get ir-rx51 going again. Then further fixes can be done as noted in the second patch. Regards, Tony Tony Lindgren (2): ARM: OMAP2+: Add more functions to pwm pdata for ir-rx51 [media] ir-rx51: Fix build

[PATCH 0/2] Fix ir-rx51 by using PWM pdata

Hi all, Here are minimal fixes to get ir-rx51 going again. Then further fixes can be done as noted in the second patch. Regards, Tony Tony Lindgren (2): ARM: OMAP2+: Add more functions to pwm pdata for ir-rx51 [media] ir-rx51: Fix build after multiarch changes broke it