Hi Hans,
On 28-03-2017 11:07, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 27/03/17 13:58, Jose Abreu wrote:
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>>
>> On 24-03-2017 12:28, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>> On 03/24/17 13:21, Jose Abreu wrote:
Hi Hans,
On 24-03-2017 12:12, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 03/24/17 12:52, Jose Abreu
On 27/03/17 13:58, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
>
> On 24-03-2017 12:28, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On 03/24/17 13:21, Jose Abreu wrote:
>>> Hi Hans,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 24-03-2017 12:12, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 03/24/17 12:52, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
>
>>> Can you please revi
Hi Hans,
On 24-03-2017 12:28, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 03/24/17 13:21, Jose Abreu wrote:
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>>
>> On 24-03-2017 12:12, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>> On 03/24/17 12:52, Jose Abreu wrote:
Hi Hans,
>> Can you please review this series, when possible? And if you
>> could
On 03/24/17 13:21, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
>
> On 24-03-2017 12:12, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On 03/24/17 12:52, Jose Abreu wrote:
>>> Hi Hans,
>>>
>>>
> Can you please review this series, when possible? And if you
> could test it on cobalt it would be great :)
Hopefully next wee
Hi Hans,
On 24-03-2017 12:12, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 03/24/17 12:52, Jose Abreu wrote:
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>>
Can you please review this series, when possible? And if you
could test it on cobalt it would be great :)
>>> Hopefully next week.
>> Thanks :)
>>
>>> Did you have some real-world
On 03/24/17 12:52, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
>
>>> Can you please review this series, when possible? And if you
>>> could test it on cobalt it would be great :)
>> Hopefully next week.
>
> Thanks :)
>
>> Did you have some real-world numbers w.r.t. measured
>> pixelclock frequencies and 60
Hi Hans,
>> Can you please review this series, when possible? And if you
>> could test it on cobalt it would be great :)
> Hopefully next week.
Thanks :)
> Did you have some real-world numbers w.r.t. measured
> pixelclock frequencies and 60 vs 59.94 Hz and 24 vs 23.976 Hz?
I did make some mea
On 03/24/17 12:03, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
>
> On 21-03-2017 11:49, Jose Abreu wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This is a follow up patch from this discussion [1]. It should be
>> seen more as a starting point to introduce better handling of
>> time per frame in v4l2. Quoting Hans Verkuil from [1]:
Hi Hans,
On 21-03-2017 11:49, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a follow up patch from this discussion [1]. It should be
> seen more as a starting point to introduce better handling of
> time per frame in v4l2. Quoting Hans Verkuil from [1]:
>
> 1) "Add a flag V4L2_DV_FL_CAN_DETECT_REDUCED_
Hi all,
This is a follow up patch from this discussion [1]. It should be
seen more as a starting point to introduce better handling of
time per frame in v4l2. Quoting Hans Verkuil from [1]:
1) "Add a flag V4L2_DV_FL_CAN_DETECT_REDUCED_FPS. If set,
then the hw can detect the difference between reg
10 matches
Mail list logo