On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 09:01 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
On 07/05/2010 07:11 PM, Andy Walls wrote:
Assuming the new kthread_worker implementation is OK, this change for
ivtv looks good.
Reviewed-by: Andy Walls awa...@md.metrocast.net
Acked-by: Andy Walls awa...@md.metrocast.net
May I
On 07/05/2010 07:11 PM, Andy Walls wrote:
Assuming the new kthread_worker implementation is OK, this change for
ivtv looks good.
Reviewed-by: Andy Walls awa...@md.metrocast.net
Acked-by: Andy Walls awa...@md.metrocast.net
May I route this patch through wq branch? As it's not clear how this
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 23:03 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
Upcoming workqueue updates will no longer guarantee fixed workqueue to
worker kthread association, so giving RT priority to the irq worker
won't work. Use kthread_worker which guarantees specific kthread
association instead. This also makes
Upcoming workqueue updates will no longer guarantee fixed workqueue to
worker kthread association, so giving RT priority to the irq worker
won't work. Use kthread_worker which guarantees specific kthread
association instead. This also makes setting the priority cleaner.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo
