I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the
corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng....@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex...@intel.com>
---
drivers/media/pci/cx25821/cx25821-video.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/cx25821/cx25821-video.c
b/drivers/media/pci/cx25821/cx25821-video.c
index c48bba9..7a8ee16 100644
--- a/drivers/media/pci/cx25821/cx25821-video.c
+++ b/drivers/media/pci/cx25821/cx25821-video.c
@@ -34,16 +34,16 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
static unsigned int video_nr[] = {[0 ... (CX25821_MAXBOARDS - 1)] = UNSET };
-module_param_array(video_nr, int, NULL, 0444);
+module_param_array(video_nr, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(video_nr, "video device numbers");
static unsigned int video_debug = VIDEO_DEBUG;
-module_param(video_debug, int, 0644);
+module_param(video_debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(video_debug, "enable debug messages [video]");
static unsigned int irq_debug;
-module_param(irq_debug, int, 0644);
+module_param(irq_debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(irq_debug, "enable debug messages [IRQ handler]");
#define FORMAT_FLAGS_PACKED 0x01
--
2.9.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
