I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the
corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng....@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex...@intel.com>
---
drivers/media/usb/pvrusb2/pvrusb2-v4l2.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/pvrusb2/pvrusb2-v4l2.c
b/drivers/media/usb/pvrusb2/pvrusb2-v4l2.c
index 81f788b..d03cba4 100644
--- a/drivers/media/usb/pvrusb2/pvrusb2-v4l2.c
+++ b/drivers/media/usb/pvrusb2/pvrusb2-v4l2.c
@@ -73,13 +73,13 @@ struct pvr2_v4l2 {
};
static int video_nr[PVR_NUM] = {[0 ... PVR_NUM-1] = -1};
-module_param_array(video_nr, int, NULL, 0444);
+module_param_array(video_nr, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(video_nr, "Offset for device's video dev minor");
static int radio_nr[PVR_NUM] = {[0 ... PVR_NUM-1] = -1};
-module_param_array(radio_nr, int, NULL, 0444);
+module_param_array(radio_nr, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(radio_nr, "Offset for device's radio dev minor");
static int vbi_nr[PVR_NUM] = {[0 ... PVR_NUM-1] = -1};
-module_param_array(vbi_nr, int, NULL, 0444);
+module_param_array(vbi_nr, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(vbi_nr, "Offset for device's vbi dev minor");
static struct v4l2_fmtdesc pvr_fmtdesc [] = {
--
2.9.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
