Re: [PATCH 1/2] si2168: Implement own I2C adapter locking

2015-06-01 Thread Antti Palosaari
On 05/31/2015 07:56 PM, Adam Baker wrote: On 29/05/15 22:05, Antti Palosaari wrote: We need own I2C locking because of tuner I2C adapter/repeater. Firmware command is executed using I2C send + reply message. Default I2C adapter locking protects only single I2C operation, not whole send + reply s

Re: [PATCH 1/2] si2168: Implement own I2C adapter locking

2015-05-31 Thread Adam Baker
On 29/05/15 22:05, Antti Palosaari wrote: We need own I2C locking because of tuner I2C adapter/repeater. Firmware command is executed using I2C send + reply message. Default I2C adapter locking protects only single I2C operation, not whole send + reply sequence as needed. Due to that, it was poss

[PATCH 1/2] si2168: Implement own I2C adapter locking

2015-05-29 Thread Antti Palosaari
We need own I2C locking because of tuner I2C adapter/repeater. Firmware command is executed using I2C send + reply message. Default I2C adapter locking protects only single I2C operation, not whole send + reply sequence as needed. Due to that, it was possible tuner I2C message interrupts firmware c