Em Mon, 23 Nov 2015 19:51:41 +0200
Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Sunday 06 September 2015 14:30:56 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Entities should have one or more functions. Calling it as a
> > type proofed to not be correct, as an entity could eve
Hi Mauro,
Thank you for the patch.
On Sunday 06 September 2015 14:30:56 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Entities should have one or more functions. Calling it as a
> type proofed to not be correct, as an entity could eventually
s/proofed/proved/
> have more than one type.
>
> So, rename the fie
On 09/06/2015 07:30 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Entities should have one or more functions. Calling it as a
> type proofed to not be correct, as an entity could eventually
> have more than one type.
>
> So, rename the field as function.
>
> Please notice that this patch doesn't extend supp
Entities should have one or more functions. Calling it as a
type proofed to not be correct, as an entity could eventually
have more than one type.
So, rename the field as function.
Please notice that this patch doesn't extend support for
multiple function entities. Such change will happen when
we
