Re: [PATCH 2/2] v4l-utils: fixed dvbv5 vdr format

2016-09-08 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Wed, 7 Sep 2016 10:59:32 -0700 VDR User escreveu: > I use nscan, which has easily been the > most successful of the scanners. An additional benefit to nscan is you > only supply a single transponder on the command line and it will > populate a channel list for the entire

Re: [PATCH 2/2] v4l-utils: fixed dvbv5 vdr format

2016-09-08 Thread VDR User
>> There is already a publicly available VDR repository offering the >> current stable & developer versions, along with all previous versions: >> http://www.tvdr.de/download.htm > > ?? these are tarballs, where is the version control system? That would be a question for Klaus, the author of VDR.

Re: [PATCH 2/2] v4l-utils: fixed dvbv5 vdr format

2016-09-08 Thread Markus Heiser
Am 07.09.2016 um 19:59 schrieb VDR User : >> It is broken (see below). Have you ever used dvbv5 tools with vdr format >> output or did you know a "VDR user" who is using dvbv5-scan and not wscan? > > In my experience the v4l scanner, wscan, and VDR's internal scanner > has

Re: [PATCH 2/2] v4l-utils: fixed dvbv5 vdr format

2016-09-07 Thread VDR User
> It is broken (see below). Have you ever used dvbv5 tools with vdr format > output or did you know a "VDR user" who is using dvbv5-scan and not wscan? In my experience the v4l scanner, wscan, and VDR's internal scanner has never worked well (for NA). I use nscan, which has easily been the most

Re: [PATCH 2/2] v4l-utils: fixed dvbv5 vdr format

2016-09-07 Thread Markus Heiser
Am 06.09.2016 um 17:47 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab : > Em Tue, 6 Sep 2016 08:16:22 -0700 > VDR User escreveu: > >> I can tell you that people do still use VDR-1.6.0-3. It would be >> unwise (and unnecessary) to break backwards compatible, which

Re: [PATCH 2/2] v4l-utils: fixed dvbv5 vdr format

2016-09-06 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Tue, 6 Sep 2016 08:16:22 -0700 VDR User escreveu: > I can tell you that people do still use VDR-1.6.0-3. It would be > unwise (and unnecessary) to break backwards compatible, which would be > grounds for NACK if you ask me. Knowingly causing breakage has always > been an

Re: [PATCH 2/2] v4l-utils: fixed dvbv5 vdr format

2016-09-06 Thread VDR User
I can tell you that people do still use VDR-1.6.0-3. It would be unwise (and unnecessary) to break backwards compatible, which would be grounds for NACK if you ask me. Knowingly causing breakage has always been an unpopular thing in the VDR community, and this sounds like it's going beyond fixing

Re: [PATCH 2/2] v4l-utils: fixed dvbv5 vdr format

2016-09-06 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Mon, 5 Sep 2016 20:01:22 +0100 Chris Mayo escreveu: > On 05/09/16 14:25, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Em Mon, 5 Sep 2016 15:13:04 +0200 > > Markus Heiser escreveu: > > > >> Hi Mauro, (Hi Chris) > >> > >> sorry for my late reply. I test the

Re: [PATCH 2/2] v4l-utils: fixed dvbv5 vdr format

2016-09-05 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Mon, 5 Sep 2016 15:13:04 +0200 Markus Heiser escreveu: > Hi Mauro, (Hi Chris) > > sorry for my late reply. I test the v4-utils on my HTPC, > where I'am not often have time for experimentation ;-) > > Am 24.08.2016 um 16:52 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab >

Re: [PATCH 2/2] v4l-utils: fixed dvbv5 vdr format

2016-09-05 Thread Markus Heiser
Hi Mauro, (Hi Chris) sorry for my late reply. I test the v4-utils on my HTPC, where I'am not often have time for experimentation ;-) Am 24.08.2016 um 16:52 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab : > Em Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:49:27 -0300 > Mauro Carvalho Chehab

Re: [PATCH 2/2] v4l-utils: fixed dvbv5 vdr format

2016-08-24 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:49:27 -0300 Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu: > Hi Markus, > > Em Wed, 10 Aug 2016 11:52:19 +0200 > Markus Heiser escreveu: > > > From: Markus Heiser > > > > From: Heiser, Markus

Re: [PATCH 2/2] v4l-utils: fixed dvbv5 vdr format

2016-08-24 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Hi Markus, Em Wed, 10 Aug 2016 11:52:19 +0200 Markus Heiser escreveu: > From: Markus Heiser > > From: Heiser, Markus > > The vdr format was broken, I got '(null)' entries > >

Re: [PATCH 2/2] v4l-utils: fixed dvbv5 vdr format

2016-08-22 Thread Markus Heiser
Am 16.08.2016 um 09:10 schrieb Markus Heiser : > Am 10.08.2016 um 11:52 schrieb Markus Heiser : > >> The vdr format was broken, I got '(null)' entries >> >> HD:11494:S1HC23I0M5N1O35:S:(null):22000:5101:5102,5103,5106,5108:0:0:10301:0:0:0:

Re: [PATCH 2/2] v4l-utils: fixed dvbv5 vdr format

2016-08-16 Thread Markus Heiser
Am 10.08.2016 um 11:52 schrieb Markus Heiser : > The vdr format was broken, I got '(null)' entries > > HD:11494:S1HC23I0M5N1O35:S:(null):22000:5101:5102,5103,5106,5108:0:0:10301:0:0:0: > 0-:1:2--:3:4-: > > refering to the VDR Wikis ... > > *

[PATCH 2/2] v4l-utils: fixed dvbv5 vdr format

2016-08-10 Thread Markus Heiser
From: Markus Heiser From: Heiser, Markus The vdr format was broken, I got '(null)' entries HD:11494:S1HC23I0M5N1O35:S:(null):22000:5101:5102,5103,5106,5108:0:0:10301:0:0:0: 0-:1:2--:3:4-: refering to the VDR Wikis ...