Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] rc: Add IR encode based wakeup filtering

2014-07-25 Thread James Hogan
Hi Mauro, On Wednesday 23 July 2014 16:39:36 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Fri, 14 Mar 2014 23:04:10 + > > James Hogan escreveu: > > A recent discussion about proposed interfaces for setting up the > > hardware wakeup filter lead to the conclusion that it could help to have > > the gener

Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] rc: Add IR encode based wakeup filtering

2014-07-23 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Fri, 14 Mar 2014 23:04:10 + James Hogan escreveu: > A recent discussion about proposed interfaces for setting up the > hardware wakeup filter lead to the conclusion that it could help to have > the generic capability to encode and modulate scancodes into raw IR > events so that drivers for

Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] rc: Add IR encode based wakeup filtering

2014-03-24 Thread David Härdeman
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:34:25PM +, James Hogan wrote: >It's ambiguous the other way too (which is probably a strong point against >having actual protocol bits for each NEC variant, since they only differ in >how the scancode is constructed). E.g. the Tivo keymap is 32-bit NEC, but has >ex

Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] rc: Add IR encode based wakeup filtering

2014-03-17 Thread James Hogan
On Monday 17 March 2014 19:01:51 Antti Seppälä wrote: > On 17 March 2014 00:41, James Hogan wrote: > > Yeh I'm in two minds about this now. It's actually a little awkward since > > some of the protocols have multiple variants (i.e. "rc-5" = RC5+RC5X), > > but an encoded message is only ever a sing

Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] rc: Add IR encode based wakeup filtering

2014-03-17 Thread Antti Seppälä
Hi James, On 17 March 2014 00:41, James Hogan wrote: > > Yeh I'm in two minds about this now. It's actually a little awkward since some > of the protocols have multiple variants (i.e. "rc-5" = RC5+RC5X), but an > encoded message is only ever a single variant, so technically if you're going > to d

Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] rc: Add IR encode based wakeup filtering

2014-03-16 Thread James Hogan
On Sunday 16 March 2014 10:22:02 Antti Seppälä wrote: > On 15 March 2014 01:04, James Hogan wrote: > > A recent discussion about proposed interfaces for setting up the > > hardware wakeup filter lead to the conclusion that it could help to have > > the generic capability to encode and modulate sca

Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] rc: Add IR encode based wakeup filtering

2014-03-16 Thread Antti Seppälä
On 15 March 2014 01:04, James Hogan wrote: > A recent discussion about proposed interfaces for setting up the > hardware wakeup filter lead to the conclusion that it could help to have > the generic capability to encode and modulate scancodes into raw IR > events so that drivers for hardware with

[PATCH v2 0/9] rc: Add IR encode based wakeup filtering

2014-03-14 Thread James Hogan
A recent discussion about proposed interfaces for setting up the hardware wakeup filter lead to the conclusion that it could help to have the generic capability to encode and modulate scancodes into raw IR events so that drivers for hardware with a low level wake filter (on the level of pulse/space