On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 01:26:43AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> I'll take a look at merging it tomorrow after I've dealt with smp_ops;
> if it looks reasonably conflict-free I'll pull it in. We need the
> sound dependency sorted out (or agreed upon) first though.
I guess in the light of the res
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 01:09:27AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > I've pulled this in now as staging/imx-multiplatform.
> >
> > As you mention, it might or might not make sense to send this up. It
> > also accrued a few more merge conflicts with other branches in
> > arm-soc, so we'll see how thi
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 12:41 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 12:46:26AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
>>> I just published the branch below with this series rebased on top of
>>> the necessary dependant branches.
>>>
>>>
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 12:46:26AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> I just published the branch below with this series rebased on top of
>> the necessary dependant branches.
>>
>> git://git.linaro.org/people/shawnguo/linux-2.6.git
>> staging/im
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 12:46:26AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> I just published the branch below with this series rebased on top of
> the necessary dependant branches.
>
> git://git.linaro.org/people/shawnguo/linux-2.6.git staging/imx-multiplatform
>
> The dependant branches include:
>
Forgot t
Hi Olof,
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 01:26:43AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> I'll take a look at merging it tomorrow after I've dealt with smp_ops;
> if it looks reasonably conflict-free I'll pull it in. We need the
> sound dependency sorted out (or agreed upon) first though.
>
I just published the
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 03:56:56PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> Ok, fair enough. I think we can put it in arm-soc/for-next as a staging
>> branch anyway to give it some exposure to linux-next, and then we can
>> decide whether a rebase is neces
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 03:56:56PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Ok, fair enough. I think we can put it in arm-soc/for-next as a staging
> branch anyway to give it some exposure to linux-next, and then we can
> decide whether a rebase is necessary before sending it to Linus.
>
I just saw the annou
On Thursday 20 September 2012, Shawn Guo wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 07:39:34AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The first five branches are scheduled to go through the arm-soc tree, so
> > I'm fine with that. For the sound/for-3.7 branch, I'd like to know when
> > to expect that hitting mai
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 07:39:34AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The first five branches are scheduled to go through the arm-soc tree, so
> I'm fine with that. For the sound/for-3.7 branch, I'd like to know when
> to expect that hitting mainline. If it always gets in very early during the
> merge w
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 08:47:10AM -0400, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 07:52:15PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 07:41:50AM -0400, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > It's usually pretty early but Takashi will be on holiday this time so
> > > I'm not sure if things might
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 07:52:15PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 07:41:50AM -0400, Mark Brown wrote:
> > It's usually pretty early but Takashi will be on holiday this time so
> > I'm not sure if things might be different (he was going to send the pull
> > request from holiday).
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 07:41:50AM -0400, Mark Brown wrote:
> It's usually pretty early but Takashi will be on holiday this time so
> I'm not sure if things might be different (he was going to send the pull
> request from holiday). I also didn't guarantee that it'll be stable
> yet, can someone pl
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 07:39:34AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The first five branches are scheduled to go through the arm-soc tree, so
> I'm fine with that. For the sound/for-3.7 branch, I'd like to know when
> to expect that hitting mainline. If it always gets in very early during the
> merge
On Thursday 20 September 2012, Shawn Guo wrote:
>
> Here is the second post, which should have addressed the comments that
> reviewers put on v1.
>
> It's available on branch below.
>
> git://git.linaro.org/people/shawnguo/linux-2.6.git imx/multi-platform-v2
>
> And it's based on the followin
Here is the second post, which should have addressed the comments that
reviewers put on v1.
It's available on branch below.
git://git.linaro.org/people/shawnguo/linux-2.6.git imx/multi-platform-v2
And it's based on the following branches.
calxeda/multi-plat
arm-soc/multiplatform/platform-
16 matches
Mail list logo
