Hi Mauro,
Thanks for the patch.
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
> The V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_FWNODE match criteria requires just one
> struct to be filled (struct fwnode_handle). The V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_DEVNAME
> match criteria requires just a device name.
>
> So, it doesn'
Hi Mauro,
On 2017-12-19 09:18:19 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_FWNODE match criteria requires just one
> struct to be filled (struct fwnode_handle). The V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_DEVNAME
> match criteria requires just a device name.
>
> So, it doesn't make sense to enclose tho
; Hugues Fruchet
> ; Gustavo A. R. Silva
> ; Sebastian Reichel ; Tomasz
> Figa ; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> samsung-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-renesas-...@vger.kernel.org;
> de...@driverdev.osuosl.org
> Subject: [PATCH v2 3/8] media: v4l2-async: simplify v4l2_asy
The V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_FWNODE match criteria requires just one
struct to be filled (struct fwnode_handle). The V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_DEVNAME
match criteria requires just a device name.
So, it doesn't make sense to enclose those into structs,
as the criteria can go directly into the union.
That makes eas
