Hi Prabhakar,
On Friday 28 November 2014 17:06:52 Prabhakar Lad wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Prabhakar,
[Snip]
+ queue-queue.lock = queue-mutex;
I'm a bit concerned that this would introduce future breakages. Setting
the queue.lock
Hi Laurent,
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Laurent Pinchart
laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com wrote:
Hi Prabhakar,
On Friday 28 November 2014 17:06:52 Prabhakar Lad wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Prabhakar,
[Snip]
+ queue-queue.lock =
Hi Laurent,
Thanks for the review.
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Laurent Pinchart
laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com wrote:
Hi Prabhakar,
[Snip]
+ queue-queue.lock = queue-mutex;
I'm a bit concerned that this would introduce future breakages. Setting the
queue.lock pointer enables
Hi Prabhakar,
Thank you for the patch.
On Wednesday 26 November 2014 23:25:44 Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
This patch drops driver specific wait_prepare() and
wait_finish() callbacks from vb2_ops and instead uses
the the helpers vb2_ops_wait_prepare/finish() provided
by the vb2 core, the lock
This patch drops driver specific wait_prepare() and
wait_finish() callbacks from vb2_ops and instead uses
the the helpers vb2_ops_wait_prepare/finish() provided
by the vb2 core, the lock member of the queue needs
to be initalized to a mutex so that vb2 helpers
vb2_ops_wait_prepare/finish() can