Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] V4L2 Explicit Synchronization support

2017-10-12 Thread Brian Starkey
Hi, On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 05:08:55PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote: Hi Brian, On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 14:41 +0100, Brian Starkey wrote: Hi Gustavo, On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 03:42:11PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > From: Gustavo Padovan > > Hi, > > Refer to the documentation on the first patc

Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] V4L2 Explicit Synchronization support

2017-10-04 Thread Gustavo Padovan
Hi Brian, On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 14:41 +0100, Brian Starkey wrote: > Hi Gustavo, > > On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 03:42:11PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > > From: Gustavo Padovan > > > > Hi, > > > > Refer to the documentation on the first patch for the details. The > > previous > > iteration is he

Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] V4L2 Explicit Synchronization support

2017-10-02 Thread Brian Starkey
Hi Gustavo, On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 03:42:11PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote: From: Gustavo Padovan Hi, Refer to the documentation on the first patch for the details. The previous iteration is here: https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@vger.kernel.org/msg118077.html The 2nd patch propose

[PATCH v3 00/15] V4L2 Explicit Synchronization support

2017-09-07 Thread Gustavo Padovan
From: Gustavo Padovan Hi, Refer to the documentation on the first patch for the details. The previous iteration is here: https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@vger.kernel.org/msg118077.html The 2nd patch proposes an userspace API for fences, then on patch 3 we prepare to the addition of in-