Hi Jonathan,
> I like the basic idea of this patch set a lot btw!
Thanks!
> Jonathan
Could you delete irrelevant parts of the message, please? I nearly
missed your other comment which would have been a great loss!
> I'm trying to get my head around whether this is a sufficient set of
>
> Right:
>
> drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c:2310:15: error: 'i2c_release_bounce_buf'
> undeclared here (not in a function)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_release_bounce_buf);
Thanks. I am just now working on V4 currently which is a redesign.
I'll write more in an hour or so.
signature.asc
Hi Wolfram,
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Wolfram Sang
wrote:
> One helper checks if DMA is suitable and optionally creates a bounce
> buffer, if not. The other function returns the bounce buffer and makes
> sure the data is properly copied back to the
On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 12:23:36 +0200
Wolfram Sang wrote:
> One helper checks if DMA is suitable and optionally creates a bounce
> buffer, if not. The other function returns the bounce buffer and makes
> sure the data is properly copied back to the message.
>
>
Hi Wolfram,
On 2017-07-18 12:23:36 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> One helper checks if DMA is suitable and optionally creates a bounce
> buffer, if not. The other function returns the bounce buffer and makes
> sure the data is properly copied back to the message.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
One helper checks if DMA is suitable and optionally creates a bounce
buffer, if not. The other function returns the bounce buffer and makes
sure the data is properly copied back to the message.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
---
Changes since v2:
* rebased to