Em Tue, 07 Jan 2014 18:03:50 +0100
Frank Schäfer fschaefer@googlemail.com escreveu:
Am 05.01.2014 22:25, schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
Em Sun, 05 Jan 2014 22:02:40 +0100
Frank Schäfer fschaefer@googlemail.com escreveu:
Am 04.01.2014 11:55, schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
From:
Am 08.01.2014 15:10, schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
Em Tue, 07 Jan 2014 18:03:50 +0100
Frank Schäfer fschaefer@googlemail.com escreveu:
Am 05.01.2014 22:25, schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
Em Sun, 05 Jan 2014 22:02:40 +0100
Frank Schäfer fschaefer@googlemail.com escreveu:
Am
Am 05.01.2014 22:25, schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
Em Sun, 05 Jan 2014 22:02:40 +0100
Frank Schäfer fschaefer@googlemail.com escreveu:
Am 04.01.2014 11:55, schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com
Is this line still correct ? ;)
Instead of
Em Sun, 05 Jan 2014 19:25:57 -0200
Mauro Carvalho Chehab m.che...@samsung.com escreveu:
Em Sun, 05 Jan 2014 22:02:40 +0100
Frank Schäfer fschaefer@googlemail.com escreveu:
Am 04.01.2014 11:55, schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com
Is this
Am 04.01.2014 11:55, schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com
Is this line still correct ? ;)
Instead of allocating/deallocating URBs and transfer buffers
every time stream is started/stopped, just do it once.
That reduces the memory allocation pressure
Em Sun, 05 Jan 2014 22:02:40 +0100
Frank Schäfer fschaefer@googlemail.com escreveu:
Am 04.01.2014 11:55, schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com
Is this line still correct ? ;)
Instead of allocating/deallocating URBs and transfer buffers
every
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com
Instead of allocating/deallocating URBs and transfer buffers
every time stream is started/stopped, just do it once.
That reduces the memory allocation pressure and makes the
code that start/stop streaming a way simpler.
Signed-off-by: Mauro