On 09/11/2018 15:41, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-11-07 at 22:25 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> Hi Kieran,
>>
>> On Wednesday, 7 November 2018 16:30:46 EET Kieran Bingham wrote:
>>> On 06/11/2018 23:13, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 23:27:19 EET Kieran Bingham
On Wed, 2018-11-07 at 22:25 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Kieran,
>
> On Wednesday, 7 November 2018 16:30:46 EET Kieran Bingham wrote:
> > On 06/11/2018 23:13, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 23:27:19 EET Kieran Bingham wrote:
> > > > From: Kieran Bingham
> > > >
Hi Kieran,
On Wednesday, 7 November 2018 16:30:46 EET Kieran Bingham wrote:
> On 06/11/2018 23:13, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 23:27:19 EET Kieran Bingham wrote:
> >> From: Kieran Bingham
> >>
> >> We have both uvc_init_video() and uvc_video_init() calls which can be
Hi Laurent,
On 06/11/2018 23:13, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Kieran,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 23:27:19 EET Kieran Bingham wrote:
>> From: Kieran Bingham
>>
>> We have both uvc_init_video() and uvc_video_init() calls which can be
>> quite confusing to
Hi Kieran,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 23:27:19 EET Kieran Bingham wrote:
> From: Kieran Bingham
>
> We have both uvc_init_video() and uvc_video_init() calls which can be
> quite confusing to determine the process for each. Now that video
> uvc_video_enable() has been
From: Kieran Bingham
We have both uvc_init_video() and uvc_video_init() calls which can be
quite confusing to determine the process for each. Now that video
uvc_video_enable() has been renamed to uvc_video_start_streaming(),
adapt these calls to suit the new flow.
Rename uvc_init_video() to
