Hello,
On Thursday, July 07, 2011 12:11 AM Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 14:07:17 +0200
> Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 05 July 2011, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > > This is yet another round of Contiguous Memory Allocator patches. I
> hope
> > > that I've managed to resolve a
On Thursday 07 July 2011 00:11:12 Andrew Morton wrote:
> I could review it and put it in there on a preliminary basis for some
> runtime testing. But the question in my mind is how different will the
> code be after the problems which rmk has identified have been fixed?
>
> If "not very different
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 14:07:17 +0200
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 July 2011, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > This is yet another round of Contiguous Memory Allocator patches. I hope
> > that I've managed to resolve all the items discussed during the Memory
> > Management summit at Linaro Meeting
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 02:07:17PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 July 2011, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > This is yet another round of Contiguous Memory Allocator patches. I hope
> > that I've managed to resolve all the items discussed during the Memory
> > Management summit at Linaro M
On Tuesday 05 July 2011, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> This is yet another round of Contiguous Memory Allocator patches. I hope
> that I've managed to resolve all the items discussed during the Memory
> Management summit at Linaro Meeting in Budapest and pointed later on
> mailing lists. The goal is to
Hello everyone,
This is yet another round of Contiguous Memory Allocator patches. I hope
that I've managed to resolve all the items discussed during the Memory
Management summit at Linaro Meeting in Budapest and pointed later on
mailing lists. The goal is to integrate it as tight as possible with
