Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 4/6] dt: bindings: as3645a: Improve label documentation, DT example

2017-11-18 Thread Jacek Anaszewski
Hi Rob, Any thoughts on my analysis? Do you think that LED function naming standardization would really make sense having the abundance of LED functions categories present in the mainline dts files? The list of standard LED function names would have to be continuously extended as people would be

Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 4/6] dt: bindings: as3645a: Improve label documentation, DT example

2017-09-23 Thread Jacek Anaszewski
On 09/22/2017 11:07 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: > On 09/20/2017 10:53 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:01:02PM +0200, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: >>> Hi Pavel, >>> >>> On 09/18/2017 10:54 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: On Mon 2017-09-18 17:49:23, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Hi Pavel,

Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 4/6] dt: bindings: as3645a: Improve label documentation, DT example

2017-09-22 Thread Jacek Anaszewski
On 09/20/2017 10:53 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:01:02PM +0200, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: >> Hi Pavel, >> >> On 09/18/2017 10:54 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: >>> On Mon 2017-09-18 17:49:23, Sakari Ailus wrote: Hi Pavel, On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:56:55PM +0200, Pavel

Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 4/6] dt: bindings: as3645a: Improve label documentation, DT example

2017-09-20 Thread Rob Herring
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:01:02PM +0200, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: > Hi Pavel, > > On 09/18/2017 10:54 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Mon 2017-09-18 17:49:23, Sakari Ailus wrote: > >> Hi Pavel, > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:56:55PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > >>> Hi! > >>> > Specify

Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 4/6] dt: bindings: as3645a: Improve label documentation, DT example

2017-09-19 Thread Jacek Anaszewski
Hi Pavel, On 09/18/2017 10:54 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Mon 2017-09-18 17:49:23, Sakari Ailus wrote: >> Hi Pavel, >> >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:56:55PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: >>> Hi! >>> Specify the exact label used if the label property is omitted in DT, as well as use label

Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 4/6] dt: bindings: as3645a: Improve label documentation, DT example

2017-09-18 Thread Pavel Machek
On Mon 2017-09-18 17:49:23, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Hi Pavel, > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:56:55PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > > Specify the exact label used if the label property is omitted in DT, as > > > well as use label in the example that conforms to LED device naming. > > >

Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 4/6] dt: bindings: as3645a: Improve label documentation, DT example

2017-09-18 Thread Sakari Ailus
Hi Pavel, On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:56:55PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > Specify the exact label used if the label property is omitted in DT, as > > well as use label in the example that conforms to LED device naming. > > > > @@ -69,11 +73,11 @@ Example > >

Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 4/6] dt: bindings: as3645a: Improve label documentation, DT example

2017-09-18 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > Specify the exact label used if the label property is omitted in DT, as > well as use label in the example that conforms to LED device naming. > > @@ -69,11 +73,11 @@ Example > flash-max-microamp = <32>; > led-max-microamp = <6>; >

[RESEND PATCH v2 4/6] dt: bindings: as3645a: Improve label documentation, DT example

2017-09-18 Thread Sakari Ailus
Specify the exact label used if the label property is omitted in DT, as well as use label in the example that conforms to LED device naming. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ams,as3645a.txt | 12 1 file changed, 8