Re: [RFC][PATCH] rtl2832: PID filter support for slave demod

2015-05-14 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:16:06 +0100 Benjamin Larsson escreveu: > On 03/16/2015 11:57 PM, Antti Palosaari wrote: > > On 03/17/2015 12:12 AM, Benjamin Larsson wrote: > >> Is this structure ok for the slave pid implementation? Or should there > >> be only one filters parameter? Will the overlaying pi

Re: [RFC][PATCH] rtl2832: PID filter support for slave demod

2015-03-16 Thread Benjamin Larsson
On 03/16/2015 11:57 PM, Antti Palosaari wrote: On 03/17/2015 12:12 AM, Benjamin Larsson wrote: Is this structure ok for the slave pid implementation? Or should there be only one filters parameter? Will the overlaying pid filter framework properly "flush" the set pid filters ? Note that this cod

Re: [RFC][PATCH] rtl2832: PID filter support for slave demod

2015-03-16 Thread Antti Palosaari
On 03/17/2015 12:12 AM, Benjamin Larsson wrote: Is this structure ok for the slave pid implementation? Or should there be only one filters parameter? Will the overlaying pid filter framework properly "flush" the set pid filters ? Note that this code currently is only compile tested. I am fine

[RFC][PATCH] rtl2832: PID filter support for slave demod

2015-03-16 Thread Benjamin Larsson
Is this structure ok for the slave pid implementation? Or should there be only one filters parameter? Will the overlaying pid filter framework properly "flush" the set pid filters ? Note that this code currently is only compile tested. MvH Benjamin Larsson >From 8efb26c18b4f9416bd516195c6a8285