Re: [RFC] SUBDEV_S/G_SELECTION IOCTLs

2011-11-28 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Sakari, On Saturday 26 November 2011 10:25:19 Sakari Ailus wrote: Laurent Pinchart wrote: On Thursday 10 November 2011 23:29:34 Sakari Ailus wrote: On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 04:23:19PM +0100, Tomasz Stanislawski wrote: On 11/08/2011 10:55 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote: [snip] A sensor

Re: [RFC] SUBDEV_S/G_SELECTION IOCTLs

2011-11-26 Thread Sakari Ailus
Laurent Pinchart wrote: Hi Sakari, Hi Laurent, On Thursday 10 November 2011 23:29:34 Sakari Ailus wrote: On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 04:23:19PM +0100, Tomasz Stanislawski wrote: On 11/08/2011 10:55 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote: Hi all, This RFC discusses the SUBDEV_S_SELECTION/SUBDEV_G_SELECTION

Re: [RFC] SUBDEV_S/G_SELECTION IOCTLs

2011-11-16 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Sakari, On Thursday 10 November 2011 23:29:34 Sakari Ailus wrote: On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 04:23:19PM +0100, Tomasz Stanislawski wrote: On 11/08/2011 10:55 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote: Hi all, This RFC discusses the SUBDEV_S_SELECTION/SUBDEV_G_SELECTION API which is intended to amend and

Re: [RFC] SUBDEV_S/G_SELECTION IOCTLs

2011-11-11 Thread HeungJun Kim
Hi Sakari, It looks nice trial for setting the image and stream size. I'm curious just one thing. Does it help to use the way setting size easily? The most media drivers has its own negotiation way, and at every time using such media drivers, the application developers should learn the way to

Re: [RFC] SUBDEV_S/G_SELECTION IOCTLs

2011-11-10 Thread Sylwester Nawrocki
Hi Sakari, On 11/08/2011 10:55 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote: Hi all, This RFC discusses the SUBDEV_S_SELECTION/SUBDEV_G_SELECTION API which is intended to amend and replace the existing SUBDEV_[SG]_CROP API. These IOCTLs have previously been discussed in the Cambridge V4L2 brainstorming meeting

Re: [RFC] SUBDEV_S/G_SELECTION IOCTLs

2011-11-10 Thread Tomasz Stanislawski
Hi Sakari, On 11/08/2011 10:55 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote: Hi all, This RFC discusses the SUBDEV_S_SELECTION/SUBDEV_G_SELECTION API which is intended to amend and replace the existing SUBDEV_[SG]_CROP API. These IOCTLs have previously been discussed in the Cambridge V4L2 brainstorming meeting [0]

Re: [RFC] SUBDEV_S/G_SELECTION IOCTLs

2011-11-10 Thread Sakari Ailus
Hi Tomasz, Thanks for your comments! On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 04:23:19PM +0100, Tomasz Stanislawski wrote: Hi Sakari, On 11/08/2011 10:55 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote: Hi all, This RFC discusses the SUBDEV_S_SELECTION/SUBDEV_G_SELECTION API which is intended to amend and replace the existing

[RFC] SUBDEV_S/G_SELECTION IOCTLs

2011-11-08 Thread Sakari Ailus
Hi all, This RFC discusses the SUBDEV_S_SELECTION/SUBDEV_G_SELECTION API which is intended to amend and replace the existing SUBDEV_[SG]_CROP API. These IOCTLs have previously been discussed in the Cambridge V4L2 brainstorming meeting [0] and their intent is to provide more configurability for