Re: [RFC] Video events, version 2.2

2009-11-13 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:59:09 +0100 Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl escreveu: On Wednesday 11 November 2009 18:29:52 Sakari Ailus wrote: Hans Verkuil wrote: On Saturday 24 October 2009 23:56:24 Sakari Ailus wrote: Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: Hi Sakari, Hi, On Fri, 2009-10-23 at

Re: [RFC] Video events, version 2.2

2009-11-13 Thread Hans Verkuil
Em Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:59:09 +0100 Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl escreveu: On Wednesday 11 November 2009 18:29:52 Sakari Ailus wrote: Hans Verkuil wrote: On Saturday 24 October 2009 23:56:24 Sakari Ailus wrote: Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: Hi Sakari, Hi, On Fri, 2009-10-23 at

Re: [RFC] Video events, version 2.2

2009-11-13 Thread Eino-Ville Talvala
On 11/13/2009 8:00 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote: Em Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:59:09 +0100 Hans Verkuilhverk...@xs4all.nl escreveu: On Wednesday 11 November 2009 18:29:52 Sakari Ailus wrote: Hans Verkuil wrote: On Saturday 24 October 2009 23:56:24 Sakari Ailus wrote:

Re: [RFC] Video events, version 2.2

2009-11-13 Thread Sakari Ailus
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: [clip] Hi Sakari, What is that status of the event API? It is my impression that it is pretty much finished. Sakari, can you make a final 2.3 RFC? Then Guru can take over and start the implementation. Ah. One thing that I was still wondering was that are there use

Re: [RFC] Video events, version 2.2

2009-11-13 Thread Sakari Ailus
Eino-Ville Talvala wrote: I think we have a use case for events that would require correlating with frames, although I agree that the buffer index would be far simpler to match with than a timestamp. The specific feature is letting the application know exactly what sensor settings were used

Re: [RFC] Video events, version 2.2

2009-11-11 Thread Sakari Ailus
Hans Verkuil wrote: On Saturday 24 October 2009 23:56:24 Sakari Ailus wrote: Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: Hi Sakari, Hi, On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 13:18 +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote: [clip] struct v4l2_event { __u32 count; __u32 type; __u32

Re: [RFC] Video events, version 2.2

2009-11-11 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 18:29:52 Sakari Ailus wrote: Hans Verkuil wrote: On Saturday 24 October 2009 23:56:24 Sakari Ailus wrote: Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: Hi Sakari, Hi, On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 13:18 +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote: [clip] struct v4l2_event { __u32 count;

Re: [RFC] Video events, version 2.2

2009-11-10 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Saturday 24 October 2009 23:56:24 Sakari Ailus wrote: Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: Hi Sakari, Hi, On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 13:18 +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote: [clip] struct v4l2_event { __u32 count; __u32 type; __u32 sequence; struct timeval

Re: [RFC] Video events, version 2.2

2009-10-24 Thread Sakari Ailus
Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: Hi Sakari, Hi, On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 13:18 +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote: [clip] struct v4l2_event { __u32 count; __u32 type; __u32 sequence; struct timeval timestamp; Can we use 'struct timespec' here. This

[RFC] Video events, version 2.2

2009-10-23 Thread Sakari Ailus
Hi, Here's the version 2.2 of the video events RFC. It's based on Laurent Pinchart's original RFC and versions 2 and 2.1 which I wrote. The old RFC is available here: URL:http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg11056.html Added Mauro to Cc. Changes to version 2.1

Re: [RFC] Video events, version 2.2

2009-10-23 Thread Ivan T. Ivanov
Hi Sakari, On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 13:18 +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote: Hi, Here's the version 2.2 of the video events RFC. It's based on Laurent Pinchart's original RFC and versions 2 and 2.1 which I wrote. The old RFC is available here: