Hi Laurent, Philipp,
Sorry for a late reply.
On Thu, 5 Jun 2014, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Philipp,
>
> On Tuesday 03 June 2014 11:30:31 Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 28.05.2014, 16:44 +0200 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> > > If you had submitted an entirely new driver for a sensor
Hi Philipp,
On Tuesday 03 June 2014 11:30:31 Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 28.05.2014, 16:44 +0200 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> > If you had submitted an entirely new driver for a sensor already supported
> > by an soc-camera sensor driver, I would have told you to fix the problem
> > on
Hi Laurent, Guennadi,
Am Mittwoch, den 28.05.2014, 16:44 +0200 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> If you had submitted an entirely new driver for a sensor already supported by
> an soc-camera sensor driver, I would have told you to fix the problem on soc-
> camera side. As you're only expanding hardware
Hi Philipp,
On Wednesday 28 May 2014 16:36:55 Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 28.05.2014, 13:04 +0200 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> > On Wednesday 28 May 2014 12:07:57 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > On Wed, 28 May 2014, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > > > Am Dienstag, den 27.05.2014, 21:48 +020
Hi Guennadi, Laurent,
Am Mittwoch, den 28.05.2014, 13:04 +0200 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> Hello,
>
> On Wednesday 28 May 2014 12:07:57 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 May 2014, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag, den 27.05.2014, 21:48 +0200 schrieb Guennadi Liakhovetski:
> > > >
Hi Laurent,
Am Mittwoch, den 28.05.2014, 13:43 +0200 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> Hi Philipp,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Monday 26 May 2014 16:03:05 Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > From the looks of it, mt9v022 and mt9v032 are very similar,
> > as are mt9v024 and mt9v034. With minimal changes it
Hi Philipp,
Thank you for the patch.
On Monday 26 May 2014 16:03:05 Philipp Zabel wrote:
> From the looks of it, mt9v022 and mt9v032 are very similar,
> as are mt9v024 and mt9v034. With minimal changes it is possible
> to support mt9v02[24] with the same driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel
Hello,
On Wednesday 28 May 2014 12:07:57 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Wed, 28 May 2014, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 27.05.2014, 21:48 +0200 schrieb Guennadi Liakhovetski:
> > > On Mon, 26 May 2014, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > > > From the looks of it, mt9v022 and mt9v032 are very s
On Wed, 28 May 2014, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Hi Guennadi,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 27.05.2014, 21:48 +0200 schrieb Guennadi Liakhovetski:
> > Hi Philipp,
> >
> > On Mon, 26 May 2014, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> >
> > > >From the looks of it, mt9v022 and mt9v032 are very similar,
> > > as are mt9v024 and
Hi Guennadi,
Am Dienstag, den 27.05.2014, 21:48 +0200 schrieb Guennadi Liakhovetski:
> Hi Philipp,
>
> On Mon, 26 May 2014, Philipp Zabel wrote:
>
> > >From the looks of it, mt9v022 and mt9v032 are very similar,
> > as are mt9v024 and mt9v034. With minimal changes it is possible
> > to support m
Hi Philipp,
On Mon, 26 May 2014, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> >From the looks of it, mt9v022 and mt9v032 are very similar,
> as are mt9v024 and mt9v034. With minimal changes it is possible
> to support mt9v02[24] with the same driver.
Are you aware of drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/mt9v022.c? With this
>From the looks of it, mt9v022 and mt9v032 are very similar,
as are mt9v024 and mt9v034. With minimal changes it is possible
to support mt9v02[24] with the same driver.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel
---
drivers/media/i2c/mt9v032.c | 56 +
1 file changed
12 matches
Mail list logo
