On 11/12/2018 05:32 PM, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2018-11-12 at 09:33 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> As was discussed here (among other places):
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/19/440
>>
>> using capture queue buffer indices to refer to reference frames is
>> not a good idea.
Hi,
On Mon, 2018-11-12 at 09:33 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> As was discussed here (among other places):
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/19/440
>
> using capture queue buffer indices to refer to reference frames is
> not a good idea. A better idea is to use a 'tag' (thanks to Alexandre
> for
As was discussed here (among other places):
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/19/440
using capture queue buffer indices to refer to reference frames is
not a good idea. A better idea is to use a 'tag' (thanks to Alexandre
for the excellent name; it's much better than 'cookie') where the
application
