On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 01:26:43AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> I'll take a look at merging it tomorrow after I've dealt with smp_ops;
> if it looks reasonably conflict-free I'll pull it in. We need the
> sound dependency sorted out (or agreed upon) first though.
I guess in the light of the res
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 01:09:27AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > I've pulled this in now as staging/imx-multiplatform.
> >
> > As you mention, it might or might not make sense to send this up. It
> > also accrued a few more merge conflicts with other branches in
> > arm-soc, so we'll see how thi
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 12:41 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 12:46:26AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
>>> I just published the branch below with this series rebased on top of
>>> the necessary dependant branches.
>>>
>>>
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 12:46:26AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> I just published the branch below with this series rebased on top of
>> the necessary dependant branches.
>>
>> git://git.linaro.org/people/shawnguo/linux-2.6.git
>> staging/im
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 12:46:26AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> I just published the branch below with this series rebased on top of
> the necessary dependant branches.
>
> git://git.linaro.org/people/shawnguo/linux-2.6.git staging/imx-multiplatform
>
> The dependant branches include:
>
Forgot t
Hi Olof,
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 01:26:43AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> I'll take a look at merging it tomorrow after I've dealt with smp_ops;
> if it looks reasonably conflict-free I'll pull it in. We need the
> sound dependency sorted out (or agreed upon) first though.
>
I just published the
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 03:56:56PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> Ok, fair enough. I think we can put it in arm-soc/for-next as a staging
>> branch anyway to give it some exposure to linux-next, and then we can
>> decide whether a rebase is neces
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 03:56:56PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Ok, fair enough. I think we can put it in arm-soc/for-next as a staging
> branch anyway to give it some exposure to linux-next, and then we can
> decide whether a rebase is necessary before sending it to Linus.
>
I just saw the annou
