On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 09:51:48AM +0100, jacopo mondi wrote:
> In your suggested fix:
>
> > (((vdelay >> 8) & 0x3) << 6) |
> > (((vact >> 8) & 0x3) << 4) |
> > (((hedelay >> 8) & 0x3) << 2) |
> > ((hact >> 8) & 0x03);
> >
>
> Won't your analyzer in that case point out that
> "15
Hi Dan,
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 10:21:09AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 03:20:16PM +0100, jacopo mondi wrote:
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 12:59:54PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > [ I know you're just copying files, but you might have a fix for these
> >
On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 03:20:16PM +0100, jacopo mondi wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 12:59:54PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > [ I know you're just copying files, but you might have a fix for these
> > since you're looking at the code. - dan ]
>
> According to the static analyz
Hi Dan,
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 12:59:54PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> [ I know you're just copying files, but you might have a fix for these
> since you're looking at the code. - dan ]
According to the static analyzer I should simply substitute all those
expressions with 0s. I would instead
[ I know you're just copying files, but you might have a fix for these
since you're looking at the code. - dan ]
Hello Jacopo Mondi,
The patch e0d76c3842ee: "media: i2c: Copy tw9910 soc_camera sensor
driver" from Feb 21, 2018, leads to the following static checker
warning:
drivers/media/i
