Just like with ctrl events, drivers may want to get called back on
listener add / remove for other event types too. Rather then special
casing all of this in subscribe / unsubscribe event it is better to
use ops for this.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
Acked-by: Hans Verkuil
Just like with ctrl events, drivers may want to get called back on
listener add / remove for other event types too. Rather then special
casing all of this in subscribe / unsubscribe event it is better to
use ops for this.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
Acked-by: Hans Verkuil
Just like with ctrl events, drivers may want to get called back on
listener add / remove for other event types too. Rather then special
casing all of this in subscribe / unsubscribe event it is better to
use ops for this.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
Acked-by: Hans Verkuil
Hi,
hverkuil wrote:
+ if (sev-ops sev-ops-add) {
+ int ret = sev-ops-add(sev);
+ if (ret) {
+ sev-ops = NULL;
+ v4l2_event_unsubscribe(fh, sub);
+ return ret;
+ }
The problem here
Just like with ctrl events, drivers may want to get called back on
listener add / remove for other event types too. Rather then special
casing all of this in subscribe / unsubscribe event it is better to
use ops for this.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
---
On Wednesday 02 November 2011 11:13:24 Hans de Goede wrote:
Just like with ctrl events, drivers may want to get called back on
listener add / remove for other event types too. Rather then special
casing all of this in subscribe / unsubscribe event it is better to
use ops for this.
Just like with ctrl events, drivers may want to get called back on
listener add / remove for other event types too. Rather then special
casing all of this in subscribe / unsubscribe event it is better to
use ops for this.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
---
On Thursday, October 27, 2011 13:18:02 Hans de Goede wrote:
Just like with ctrl events, drivers may want to get called back on
listener add / remove for other event types too. Rather then special
casing all of this in subscribe / unsubscribe event it is better to
use ops for this.
On Sunday, October 30, 2011 12:17:28 Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Thursday, October 27, 2011 13:18:02 Hans de Goede wrote:
Just like with ctrl events, drivers may want to get called back on
listener add / remove for other event types too. Rather then special
casing all of this in subscribe /
Hi,
On 10/27/2011 02:30 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Hans,
On Thursday 27 October 2011 13:18:02 Hans de Goede wrote:
Just like with ctrl events, drivers may want to get called back on
listener add / remove for other event types too. Rather then special
casing all of this in subscribe /
Just like with ctrl events, drivers may want to get called back on
listener add / remove for other event types too. Rather then special
casing all of this in subscribe / unsubscribe event it is better to
use ops for this.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
---
Hi Hans et all,
As discussed at the kernel summit. Note I have only compile tested this
as I've no control event capable hardware with me (until I'm done with
adding support for ctrl events to the UVC driver).
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
Just like with ctrl events, drivers may want to get called back on
listener add / remove for other event types too. Rather then special
casing all of this in subscribe / unsubscribe event it is better to
use ops for this.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
---
13 matches
Mail list logo