On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
snip
>>Or a few months later. About two weeks ago, I finally poked at these
>>sticks some more, after getting a bit of info from another user, and
>>we've finally got an actual fix for this problem -- .deny_i2c_rptr = 1
>>just needed to be se
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Nov 17, 2009, at 9:37 AM, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> If you see this happen more than once consecutively, and there is only 1
> silicon tuner present, then it means something very bad is happening, and
> there is a chance of bu
On Nov 17, 2009, at 9:37 AM, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>> On Nov 17, 2009, at 1:03 AM, Robert Cicconetti wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:55 AM, Michael Krufky
>>> wrote:
> [ 812.465930] tda18271: performing RF tracking filt
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>> It happened at every tuning operation, and made mythfrontend unhappy
>> (unable to tune after the first channel). I disabled the check for
>> RF_CAL_OK which triggered the recalibration, and mythfrontend worked.
>
> Yeah, tuning is much quick
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Nov 17, 2009, at 1:03 AM, Robert Cicconetti wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:55 AM, Michael Krufky wrote:
[ 812.465930] tda18271: performing RF tracking filter calibration
[ 818.572446] tda18271: RF tracking filter
On Nov 17, 2009, at 1:03 AM, Robert Cicconetti wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:55 AM, Michael Krufky wrote:
>>> [ 812.465930] tda18271: performing RF tracking filter calibration
>>> [ 818.572446] tda18271: RF tracking filter calibration complete
>>> [ 818.953946] tda18271: perform
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:55 AM, Michael Krufky wrote:
>> [ 812.465930] tda18271: performing RF tracking filter calibration
>> [ 818.572446] tda18271: RF tracking filter calibration complete
>> [ 818.953946] tda18271: performing RF tracking filter calibration
>> [ 825.093211] tda1
Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Nov 15, 2009, at 11:55 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 11/15/2009 11:46 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 10/09/2009 09:27 PM, Robert Cicconetti wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Oct 7, 2009, at 9:39 PM, Robert Cicconetti wrote:
Okay... I built the ti
On Nov 15, 2009, at 11:55 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On 11/15/2009 11:46 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>> On 10/09/2009 09:27 PM, Robert Cicconetti wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Oct 7, 2009, at 9:39 PM, Robert Cicconetti wrote:
> Okay... I built the tip of th
On 11/15/2009 11:46 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 10/09/2009 09:27 PM, Robert Cicconetti wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Oct 7, 2009, at 9:39 PM, Robert Cicconetti wrote:
Okay... I built the tip of the archive linked above. It works with my
UB435-Q fairly well, buil
On 10/09/2009 09:27 PM, Robert Cicconetti wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Oct 7, 2009, at 9:39 PM, Robert Cicconetti wrote:
Okay... I built the tip of the archive linked above. It works with my
UB435-Q fairly well, built against 2.6.28-15-generic #52-Ubuntu SMP
x
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Oct 7, 2009, at 9:39 PM, Robert Cicconetti wrote:
>> Okay... I built the tip of the archive linked above. It works with my
>> UB435-Q fairly well, built against 2.6.28-15-generic #52-Ubuntu SMP
>> x86_64. I've been able to stream QAM256 con
On Oct 7, 2009, at 9:39 PM, Robert Cicconetti wrote:
Jarod Wilson wrote:
With that caveat emptor, here's where the tree that should at least
get you 95% of the way
there with that stick resides:
http://www.kernellabs.com/hg/~mkrufky/lgdt3304-3/
Okay... I built the tip of the archive linked
Jarod Wilson wrote:
> With that caveat emptor, here's where the tree that should at least get you
> 95% of the way
> there with that stick resides:
>
> http://www.kernellabs.com/hg/~mkrufky/lgdt3304-3/
Okay... I built the tip of the archive linked above. It works with my
UB435-Q fairly well, buil
On Mon August 17 2009, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Aug 17, 2009, at 3:28 PM, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> > Yeah, I've had absolutely no luck with it so far, and have returned
> > it :(
> > given your experience, and mine combined, I don't think its worth
> > the time to
> > fix it. Especially since I c
On Aug 17, 2009, at 3:28 PM, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
Yeah, I've had absolutely no luck with it so far, and have returned
it :(
given your experience, and mine combined, I don't think its worth
the time to
fix it. Especially since I can't even tune a channel on the darn
thing in any
OS I h
On Mon August 17 2009, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Aug 14, 2009, at 11:03 AM, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> > On Fri August 14 2009, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> >> On Aug 14, 2009, at 1:12 AM, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> >>> On Thu August 13 2009, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Aug 13, 2009, at 12:53 AM, Thomas
On Aug 14, 2009, at 11:03 AM, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
On Fri August 14 2009, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Aug 14, 2009, at 1:12 AM, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
On Thu August 13 2009, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Aug 13, 2009, at 12:53 AM, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
I stupidly bought the KWorld UB435-Q usb AT
On Fri August 14 2009, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Aug 14, 2009, at 1:12 AM, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> > On Thu August 13 2009, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> >> On Aug 13, 2009, at 12:53 AM, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> >>> I stupidly bought the KWorld UB435-Q usb ATSC tuner thinking it was
> >>> supported
> >
On Aug 14, 2009, at 1:12 AM, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
On Thu August 13 2009, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Aug 13, 2009, at 12:53 AM, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
I stupidly bought the KWorld UB435-Q usb ATSC tuner thinking it was
supported
under linux, and it turns out it isn't. I'm wondering what it wo
On Thu August 13 2009, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Aug 13, 2009, at 12:53 AM, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> > I stupidly bought the KWorld UB435-Q usb ATSC tuner thinking it was
> > supported
> > under linux, and it turns out it isn't. I'm wondering what it would
> > take to
> > get it supported. It seem
On Aug 13, 2009, at 12:53 AM, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
I stupidly bought the KWorld UB435-Q usb ATSC tuner thinking it was
supported
under linux, and it turns out it isn't. I'm wondering what it would
take to
get it supported. It seems like all of the main chips it uses are
supported,
but
I stupidly bought the KWorld UB435-Q usb ATSC tuner thinking it was supported
under linux, and it turns out it isn't. I'm wondering what it would take to
get it supported. It seems like all of the main chips it uses are supported,
but the glue code is missing.
I have some C (10 years) programmi
I stupidly bought the KWorld UB435-Q usb ATSC tuner thinking it was supported
under linux, and it turns out it isn't. I'm wondering what it would take to
get it supported. It seems like all of the main chips it uses are supported,
but the glue code is missing.
I have some C (10 years) programmi
24 matches
Mail list logo
