Hi Laurent,
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 13:19:40, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Manjunath,
>
> On Friday 11 May 2012 05:32:13 Hadli, Manjunath wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 15:36:16, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 17 April 2012 14:22:59 Manjunath Hadli wrote:
> > > > As the same interru
Hi Manjunath,
On Friday 11 May 2012 05:32:13 Hadli, Manjunath wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 15:36:16, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tuesday 17 April 2012 14:22:59 Manjunath Hadli wrote:
> > > As the same interrupt is shared between capture and display devices,
> > > sometimes we get isr calls
Hi Laurent,
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 15:36:16, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Manjunath,
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> On Tuesday 17 April 2012 14:22:59 Manjunath Hadli wrote:
> > As the same interrupt is shared between capture and display devices,
> > sometimes we get isr calls where the interrup
Hi Manjunath,
Thanks for the patch.
On Tuesday 17 April 2012 14:22:59 Manjunath Hadli wrote:
> As the same interrupt is shared between capture and display devices,
> sometimes we get isr calls where the interrupt might not genuinely belong
> to capture or display. Hence, add a condition in the is