On Saturday 15 October 2011, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:52:04 +0200
Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
What I would really want to hear from you is your opinion on
the architecture independent stuff. Obviously, ARM is the
most important consumer of the patch set, but I
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:52:04 +0200
Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2011, Andrew Morton wrote:
Russell's going to hate me, but...
I do know that he had substantial objections to at least earlier
versions of this, and he is a guy who knows of what he speaks.
Hello,
On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 12:57 AM Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 18:27:06 +0200 Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On Thursday 06 October 2011, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
Once again I decided to post an updated version of the Contiguous Memory
Allocator patches.
On Tuesday 11 October 2011, Andrew Morton wrote:
Russell's going to hate me, but...
I do know that he had substantial objections to at least earlier
versions of this, and he is a guy who knows of what he speaks.
So I would want to get a nod from rmk on this work before proceeding.
If
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 18:27:06 +0200
Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On Thursday 06 October 2011, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
Once again I decided to post an updated version of the Contiguous Memory
Allocator patches.
This version provides mainly a bugfix for a very rare issue that might
On Thursday 06 October 2011, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
Once again I decided to post an updated version of the Contiguous Memory
Allocator patches.
This version provides mainly a bugfix for a very rare issue that might
have changed migration type of the CMA page blocks resulting in dropping
