Hi Sylwester,
On Thursday 07 April 2011 00:04:45 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:05 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 03/07/2011 12:20 AM, Pawel Osciak wrote:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 02:54, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Monday 28 February 2011 16:44:38 Pawel Osciak wrote:
Hi
Hello,
On Friday, April 08, 2011 2:53 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
...
As buf_queue callback is called by vb2 only after start_streaming,
for a camera snapshot capture I needed to start a pipeline only from
the
buf_queue handler level, i.e. subdev's video s_stream op was called
from
Hi Marek,
On Friday 08 April 2011 15:09:02 Marek Szyprowski wrote:
On Friday, April 08, 2011 2:53 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
[snip]
buf_queue is called with a spinlock help, so you can't perform I2C
communication there.
In videobuf2 buf_queue() IS NOT called with any spinlock held.
Hi Laurent!
On 04/08/2011 02:53 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Sylwester,
On Thursday 07 April 2011 00:04:45 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:05 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 03/07/2011 12:20 AM, Pawel Osciak wrote:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 02:54, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On
On 04/06/2011 10:05 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
Hi Pawel,
On 03/07/2011 12:20 AM, Pawel Osciak wrote:
Hi Laurent,
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 02:54, Laurent Pinchart
laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com wrote:
Hi Pawel,
On Monday 28 February 2011 16:44:38 Pawel Osciak wrote:
Hi Laurent,
A
Hi Pawel,
On Monday 07 March 2011 00:20:36 Pawel Osciak wrote:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 02:54, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Monday 28 February 2011 16:44:38 Pawel Osciak wrote:
Hi Laurent,
A few questions from me below. I feel we need to talk about this
change a bit more, it introduces some
Hi Laurent,
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 02:54, Laurent Pinchart
laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com wrote:
Hi Pawel,
On Monday 28 February 2011 16:44:38 Pawel Osciak wrote:
Hi Laurent,
A few questions from me below. I feel we need to talk about this
change a bit more, it introduces some recovery
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 15:20 -0800, Pawel Osciak wrote:
Hi Laurent,
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 02:54, Laurent Pinchart
I think a disconnection is pretty fatal. If the user unplugs the webcam,
there's not much that can be done anymore. Userspace needs to be woken up
with
all buffers
Hi Pawel,
On Monday 28 February 2011 16:44:38 Pawel Osciak wrote:
Hi Laurent,
A few questions from me below. I feel we need to talk about this
change a bit more, it introduces some recovery and consistency
problems, unless I'm missing something.
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:12, Laurent
Hello,
On Sunday, February 27, 2011 7:13 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
videobuf2 expects drivers to check buffer in the buf_prepare operation
and to return success only if the buffer can queued without any issue.
For hot-pluggable devices, disconnection events need to be handled at
buf_queue
Hi Laurent,
A few questions from me below. I feel we need to talk about this
change a bit more, it introduces some recovery and consistency
problems, unless I'm missing something.
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:12, Laurent Pinchart
laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com wrote:
videobuf2 expects drivers
11 matches
Mail list logo
