Re: [RFC v4] Multi-plane buffer support for V4L2 API

2010-07-17 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Tuesday 13 July 2010 11:43:47 Pawel Osciak wrote: > Hi Mauro, > > thanks for taking the time to look at this. > > >Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > >With Hans proposed changes that you've already acked, I think the proposal is > >ok, > >except for one detail: > > > >> 4. Format enumeration

RE: [RFC v4] Multi-plane buffer support for V4L2 API

2010-07-13 Thread Pawel Osciak
Hi Mauro, thanks for taking the time to look at this. >Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > >With Hans proposed changes that you've already acked, I think the proposal is >ok, >except for one detail: > >> 4. Format enumeration >> -- >> struct v4l2_fmtdesc, used for form

Re: [RFC v4] Multi-plane buffer support for V4L2 API

2010-07-12 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Hi Pawel, Em 09-07-2010 15:59, Pawel Osciak escreveu: > Hello, > > This is the fourth version of the multi-plane API extensions proposal. > I think that we have reached a stage at which it is more or less finalized. > > Rationale can be found at the beginning of the original thread: > http://thr

Re: [RFC v4] Multi-plane buffer support for V4L2 API

2010-07-12 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Monday 12 July 2010 11:14:30 Pawel Osciak wrote: > Hi Hans, > > thank you for your comments as always. > > >Hans Verkuil wrote : > >Hi Pawel, > > > >Looks good, but I have a few small suggestions: > > > >On Friday 09 July 2010 20:59:45 Pawel Osciak wrote: > > (snip) > > >> struct v4l2_forma

RE: [RFC v4] Multi-plane buffer support for V4L2 API

2010-07-12 Thread Pawel Osciak
Hi Hans, thank you for your comments as always. >Hans Verkuil wrote : >Hi Pawel, > >Looks good, but I have a few small suggestions: > >On Friday 09 July 2010 20:59:45 Pawel Osciak wrote: (snip) >> struct v4l2_format { >> enum v4l2_buf_type type; >> union { >> st

Re: [RFC v4] Multi-plane buffer support for V4L2 API

2010-07-10 Thread Hans Verkuil
Hi Pawel, Looks good, but I have a few small suggestions: On Friday 09 July 2010 20:59:45 Pawel Osciak wrote: > Hello, > > This is the fourth version of the multi-plane API extensions proposal. > I think that we have reached a stage at which it is more or less finalized. > > Rationale can be fo