2017-03-14 2:54 GMT+09:00 Alan Cox :
>
> On Mon, 2017-03-13 at 19:54 +0900, Daeseok Youn wrote:
> > If the atomisp_kernel_zalloc() has "true" as a second parameter, it
> > tries to allocate zeroing memory from kmalloc(vmalloc) and memset.
> > But using kzalloc is rather than kmalloc followed by mem
On Mon, 2017-03-13 at 19:54 +0900, Daeseok Youn wrote:
> If the atomisp_kernel_zalloc() has "true" as a second parameter, it
> tries to allocate zeroing memory from kmalloc(vmalloc) and memset.
> But using kzalloc is rather than kmalloc followed by memset with 0.
> (vzalloc is for same reason with
2017-03-13 23:07 GMT+09:00 DaeSeok Youn :
> 2017-03-13 20:51 GMT+09:00 Dan Carpenter :
>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 07:54:21PM +0900, Daeseok Youn wrote:
>>> If the atomisp_kernel_zalloc() has "true" as a second parameter, it
>>> tries to allocate zeroing memory from kmalloc(vmalloc) and memset.
>>>
2017-03-13 20:51 GMT+09:00 Dan Carpenter :
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 07:54:21PM +0900, Daeseok Youn wrote:
>> If the atomisp_kernel_zalloc() has "true" as a second parameter, it
>> tries to allocate zeroing memory from kmalloc(vmalloc) and memset.
>> But using kzalloc is rather than kmalloc followe
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 07:54:21PM +0900, Daeseok Youn wrote:
> If the atomisp_kernel_zalloc() has "true" as a second parameter, it
> tries to allocate zeroing memory from kmalloc(vmalloc) and memset.
> But using kzalloc is rather than kmalloc followed by memset with 0.
> (vzalloc is for same reaso