On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 11:38:54AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 11:25:57AM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote:
We've been faced with the problem of being able to pass both MFD
related data and a platform_data pointer to some of those drivers.
Squeezing the MFD bits in the
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 03:09:00PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 09:59:02PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 08:47:34PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
What is a MFD cell pointer and why is it needed in struct device?
An MFD cell is an MFD
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 03:40:23PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
Hi Felipe,
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 09:59:02PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 08:47:34PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
What is a MFD cell pointer and why is it needed in struct device?
An MFD
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 07:35:15AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
Below is a patch for the Xilinx SPI example. Although this would fix the
issue, we'd still have to do that on device per device basis. I had a
similar
solution where MFD drivers would set a flag for sub drivers that don't need
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 12:03:15PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
diff --git a/include/linux/platform_device.h
b/include/linux/platform_device.h
index d96db98..734d254 100644
--- a/include/linux/platform_device.h
+++
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 05:03:23PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 07:35:15AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
Below is a patch for the Xilinx SPI example. Although this would fix the
issue, we'd still have to do that on device per device basis. I had a
similar
solution
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 09:04:29PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
The second step would be to get rid of mfd_get_data() and have all
subdrivers
going back to the regular platform_data way. They would no longer be
dependant
on the MFD code except for those who really need it. In that case
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 05:23:23PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
--- a/include/linux/device.h
+++ b/include/linux/device.h
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ struct class;
struct subsys_private;
struct bus_type;
struct device_node;
+struct mfd_cell;
struct bus_attribute {
struct attribute
Hi Greg,
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 08:58:05AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 05:23:23PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
--- a/include/linux/device.h
+++ b/include/linux/device.h
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ struct class;
struct subsys_private;
struct bus_type;
struct device_node;
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 19:05 +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
Hi Greg,
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 08:58:05AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 05:23:23PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
--- a/include/linux/device.h
+++ b/include/linux/device.h
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ struct class;
struct
Hi Ben,
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 06:16:49PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
So, adding an MFD cell pointer to the device structure allows us to cleanly
pass both pieces of information, while keeping all the MFD sub drivers
independant from the MFD core if they want/can.
Why isn't an MFD the
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 07:05:38PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
Hi Greg,
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 08:58:05AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 05:23:23PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
--- a/include/linux/device.h
+++ b/include/linux/device.h
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ struct class;
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 19:51 +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
Hi Ben,
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 06:16:49PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
So, adding an MFD cell pointer to the device structure allows us to
cleanly
pass both pieces of information, while keeping all the MFD sub drivers
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 10:56:47 -0700
Greg KH gre...@suse.de wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 07:05:38PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
Hi Greg,
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 08:58:05AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 05:23:23PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
--- a/include/linux/device.h
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 11:25:57AM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote:
We've been faced with the problem of being able to pass both MFD
related data and a platform_data pointer to some of those drivers.
Squeezing the MFD bits in the sub driver platform_data pointer
doesn't work for drivers
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 10:56:47AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 07:05:38PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
Hi Greg,
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 08:58:05AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 05:23:23PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
--- a/include/linux/device.h
+++
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 08:47:34PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
What is a MFD cell pointer and why is it needed in struct device?
An MFD cell is an MFD instantiated device.
MFD (Multi Function Device) drivers instantiate platform devices. Those
devices drivers sometimes need a
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 09:59:02PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 08:47:34PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
What is a MFD cell pointer and why is it needed in struct device?
An MFD cell is an MFD instantiated device.
MFD (Multi Function Device) drivers
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 05:58:44PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 11:56:35AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Andres Salomon dilin...@queued.net
wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 12:03:15PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 05:58:44PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 11:56:35AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:47
Hi Grant,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 05:05:22PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 08:08:12PM -0800, Andres Salomon wrote:
No need to explicitly set the cell's platform_data/data_size.
In this case, move the various platform_data pointers
to driver_data. All of the
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 13:20:31 +0200
Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 05:05:22PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
[...]
Gah. Not all devices instantiated via mfd will be an mfd device,
which means that the driver may very well expect an *entirely
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Andres Salomon dilin...@queued.net wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 13:20:31 +0200
Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 05:05:22PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
[...]
Gah. Not all devices instantiated via mfd will be an mfd
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Andres Salomon dilin...@queued.net wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 13:20:31 +0200
Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 05:05:22PM -0600, Grant
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 10:47:56AM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 13:20:31 +0200
Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 05:05:22PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
[...]
Gah. Not all devices instantiated via mfd will be an mfd device,
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 11:56:35AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Andres Salomon dilin...@queued.net wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 13:20:31 +0200
Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 05:05:22PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 11:56:35AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Andres Salomon dilin...@queued.net wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 13:20:31 +0200
Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 17:58:44 -0600
Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 11:56:35AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Andres Salomon
dilin...@queued.net
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 08:08:12PM -0800, Andres Salomon wrote:
No need to explicitly set the cell's platform_data/data_size.
In this case, move the various platform_data pointers
to driver_data. All of the clients which make use of it
are also changed.
Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon
29 matches
Mail list logo
