Re: [RFC PATCH 03/12] mt9m001: convert to the control framework.

2011-01-25 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Sunday, January 23, 2011 04:38:21 Kim HeungJun wrote: Hello, I'm reading threads about the new v4l2_ctrl framework and If you don't mind I gotta tell you my humble opinion about testing result the new v4l2_ctrl framework subdev. I have actually similar curcumstance, with I2C subdev

Re: [RFC PATCH 03/12] mt9m001: convert to the control framework.

2011-01-24 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Saturday, January 22, 2011 22:21:23 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Hans Verkuil wrote: Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl --- drivers/media/video/mt9m001.c | 210 +++-- 1 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 135

Re: [RFC PATCH 03/12] mt9m001: convert to the control framework.

2011-01-22 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Hans Verkuil wrote: Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl --- drivers/media/video/mt9m001.c | 210 +++-- 1 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 135 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/media/video/mt9m001.c

Re: [RFC PATCH 03/12] mt9m001: convert to the control framework.

2011-01-22 Thread Kim HeungJun
Hello, I'm reading threads about the new v4l2_ctrl framework and If you don't mind I gotta tell you my humble opinion about testing result the new v4l2_ctrl framework subdev. I have actually similar curcumstance, with I2C subdev M5MOLS Fujitsu device which is just send the patch and S5PC210 board