Re: Test results for ir-kbd-i2c.c changes (Re: [PATCH 0/6] ir-kbd-i2c conversion to the new i2c binding model)

2009-04-06 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Andy, On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 07:56:22 -0400, Andy Walls wrote: > On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 10:54 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > Thanks a lot for the testing! > > You're welcome. > > Sorry for being such a pain to what I suspect you hoped was to be a > "simple" change. You must be kidding. For one t

Re: Test results for ir-kbd-i2c.c changes (Re: [PATCH 0/6] ir-kbd-i2c conversion to the new i2c binding model)

2009-04-06 Thread Andy Walls
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 10:54 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Andy, > Note that struct IR_i2c_init_data only contains the fields I needed at > the moment, but it would be trivial to extend it to allow bridge > drivers to pass more setup information if needed, for example ir_type. Yeah, I could hav

Re: Test results for ir-kbd-i2c.c changes (Re: [PATCH 0/6] ir-kbd-i2c conversion to the new i2c binding model)

2009-04-06 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Andy, On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 20:22:59 -0400, Andy Walls wrote: > I tested your original patch set so you can get some real feedback. The > news is good, but I'll bore you with the details first. :) > > > 1. My setup: > > HVR-1600: Hauppauge model 74041, rev C5B2, serial# 891351 > has no radi

Test results for ir-kbd-i2c.c changes (Re: [PATCH 0/6] ir-kbd-i2c conversion to the new i2c binding model)

2009-04-05 Thread Andy Walls
On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 16:40 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Mauro, > > On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 07:01:16 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > > 3) So far, nobody gave us any positive return that the new IR model is > > working with > > any of the touched drivers. So, more tests are needed. I'm