On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Sedji Gaouaou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry to answer you so late about the driver.
> I have a working version which is based on 2.6.27. It is using the V4L2 API,
> but not the soc-video.
> I am not able to update it for the time being, even if it is something that we
> want to do.
Hi Sedji,
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Sedji Gaouaou wrote:
> Well I am confused now...Should I still convert the atmel ISI driver to a soc
> driver?
> My concern was not to release a driver for the ov9655, but to have one which
> is working so I could test my atmel-soc driver :)
> Because I only have an
On Monday 23 March 2009 16:40:06 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Sedji Gaouaou wrote:
> > I am writing a driver for the ov9655 sensor from Omnivision.
> > To do so I am using the ov772x.c file as an example.
> > But I don't understant, because it seems that I never enter the
> >
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Sedji Gaouaou wrote:
> Well I am confused now...Should I still convert the atmel ISI driver to a soc
> driver?
Yes, don't worry, all drivers in the mainline will be converted
"automatically," whereas, if you don't convert it now - before the switch
to v4l2-device, you'll ha
Well I am confused now...Should I still convert the atmel ISI driver to
a soc driver?
My concern was not to release a driver for the ov9655, but to have one
which is working so I could test my atmel-soc driver :)
Because I only have an ov9655 sensor here...
Regards
Sedji
Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Sedji Gaouaou wrote:
> Guennadi Liakhovetski a écrit :
> >
> > Wouldn't ov9655 be similar enough to ov9650 as used in stk-sensor.c? Hans,
> > would that one also be converted to v4l2-device? If so, Sedji, you don't
> > need to write yet another driver for it.
>
> I had a lo
Guennadi Liakhovetski a écrit :
Wouldn't ov9655 be similar enough to ov9650 as used in stk-sensor.c? Hans,
would that one also be converted to v4l2-device? If so, Sedji, you don't
need to write yet another driver for it.
I had a look at the stk-sensor file. Does it follow the soc arch?
Reg
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Sedji Gaouaou wrote:
> I am writing a driver for the ov9655 sensor from Omnivision.
> To do so I am using the ov772x.c file as an example.
> But I don't understant, because it seems that I never enter the video_probe
> function...
> Do you have any idea what could I do wrong?
Hi,
I am writing a driver for the ov9655 sensor from Omnivision.
To do so I am using the ov772x.c file as an example.
But I don't understant, because it seems that I never enter the
video_probe function...
Do you have any idea what could I do wrong? Is it coming from a wrong
i2c config?
Regar
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Sedji Gaouaou wrote:
> I am currently porting an atmel isi driver to the soc layer,
This is good!
> and I encounter some problems.
> I have based my driver on pax-camera. and sh_mobile_ceu_camera.c.
> The point is I can't see any video entry in /dev when I do ls dev/ on my
>
Hi,
I am currently porting an atmel isi driver to the soc layer, and I
encounter some problems.
I have based my driver on pax-camera. and sh_mobile_ceu_camera.c.
The point is I can't see any video entry in /dev when I do ls dev/ on my
board...
So I wonder when is soc_camera_video_start(which c
11 matches
Mail list logo
