Re: dvb_usb_af9015: command failed=1 _ kernel >= 4.1.x

2015-08-12 Thread poma
On 11.08.2015 00:40, Antti Palosaari wrote: > On 08/11/2015 12:46 AM, poma wrote: >> Furthermore, to fix this issue - AF9015 DVB-T USB2.0 stick brokenness - is >> the responsibility of developers. >> I am here only proven tester. >> >> I hope we understand each other, and this problem will be reso

Re: dvb_usb_af9015: command failed=1 _ kernel >= 4.1.x

2015-08-10 Thread Antti Palosaari
On 08/11/2015 12:46 AM, poma wrote: Furthermore, to fix this issue - AF9015 DVB-T USB2.0 stick brokenness - is the responsibility of developers. I am here only proven tester. I hope we understand each other, and this problem will be resolved in good faith. Your patches are implemented wrong.

Re: dvb_usb_af9015: command failed=1 _ kernel >= 4.1.x

2015-08-10 Thread poma
On 31.07.2015 17:55, Olli Salonen wrote: > Hi Poma, > > Might I suggest reading points 9, 10 and 11 from the following document: > https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/SubmittingPatches > > Especially point 11 needs to be taken care of in order for your patch to be > merged. > > Cheers, > -o

Re: dvb_usb_af9015: command failed=1 _ kernel >= 4.1.x

2015-07-31 Thread poma
On 13.07.2015 11:48, poma wrote: > On 07.07.2015 10:48, poma wrote: >> On 06.07.2015 22:17, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote: >>> I made the patch for the af9035. I have not a af9015 whith mxl5007 and dual >>> channel. Revert it, if it cause regresions. >>> >>> Jose Alberto >>> >> >> Thanks. >> >> From

Re: dvb_usb_af9015: command failed=1 _ kernel >= 4.1.x

2015-07-13 Thread poma
On 07.07.2015 10:48, poma wrote: > On 06.07.2015 22:17, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote: >> I made the patch for the af9035. I have not a af9015 whith mxl5007 and dual >> channel. Revert it, if it cause regresions. >> >> Jose Alberto >> > > Thanks. > > From e19560ea038e54dc57be717db55f19d449df63f0 Mo

Re: dvb_usb_af9015: command failed=1 _ kernel >= 4.1.x

2015-07-07 Thread poma
On 06.07.2015 22:17, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote: > I made the patch for the af9035. I have not a af9015 whith mxl5007 and dual > channel. Revert it, if it cause regresions. > > Jose Alberto > Thanks. >From e19560ea038e54dc57be717db55f19d449df63f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: poma Date: Tue,

Re: dvb_usb_af9015: command failed=1 _ kernel >= 4.1.x

2015-07-06 Thread Jose Alberto Reguero
I made the patch for the af9035. I have not a af9015 whith mxl5007 and dual channel. Revert it, if it cause regresions. Jose Alberto ยก Enviado desde mi ASUS Pad poma wrote: >On 26.05.2015 14:24, poma wrote: >> >> If it is not taken into account the already known problem of unreliable >> oper

Re: dvb_usb_af9015: command failed=1 _ kernel >= 4.1.x

2015-07-02 Thread poma
On 26.05.2015 14:24, poma wrote: > > If it is not taken into account the already known problem of unreliable > operation of the first tuner of the two, > the device works reliably within kernel 4.0.4 with mxl5007t.ko reverted to > http://git.linuxtv.org/cgit.cgi/media_tree.git/commit/drivers/medi

Re: dvb_usb_af9015: command failed=1 _ kernel >= 4.1.x

2015-05-26 Thread poma
If it is not taken into account the already known problem of unreliable operation of the first tuner of the two, the device works reliably within kernel 4.0.4 with mxl5007t.ko reverted to http://git.linuxtv.org/cgit.cgi/media_tree.git/commit/drivers/media/tuners/mxl5007t.c?id=ccae7af that is in t

Re: dvb_usb_af9015: command failed=1 _ kernel >= 4.1.x

2015-05-21 Thread poma
On 18.05.2015 21:15, poma wrote: > On 17.05.2015 01:07, Antti Palosaari wrote: ... >> try that >> http://git.linuxtv.org/cgit.cgi/anttip/media_tree.git/commit/?h=af9015_mxl5007t_1 >> >> Antti >> > > Thanks. > For now, I have noticed, unlike before the EIT program data are updated in > full and pr

Re: dvb_usb_af9015: command failed=1 _ kernel >= 4.1.x

2015-05-18 Thread poma
On 17.05.2015 01:07, Antti Palosaari wrote: > > > On 05/13/2015 06:56 AM, poma wrote: >> On 12.05.2015 16:11, Antti Palosaari wrote: >>> On 05/11/2015 09:43 PM, poma wrote: On 05/11/2015 12:25 AM, poma wrote: > On 10.05.2015 12:38, poma wrote: >> On 08.05.2015 12:59, poma wrote: >> I

Re: dvb_usb_af9015: command failed=1 _ kernel >= 4.1.x

2015-05-16 Thread Antti Palosaari
On 05/13/2015 06:56 AM, poma wrote: On 12.05.2015 16:11, Antti Palosaari wrote: On 05/11/2015 09:43 PM, poma wrote: On 05/11/2015 12:25 AM, poma wrote: On 10.05.2015 12:38, poma wrote: On 08.05.2015 12:59, poma wrote: Is a beer keg enough as bribe? :) Just do not say that you drink juice.

Re: dvb_usb_af9015: command failed=1 _ kernel >= 4.1.x

2015-05-12 Thread poma
On 12.05.2015 16:11, Antti Palosaari wrote: > On 05/11/2015 09:43 PM, poma wrote: >> On 05/11/2015 12:25 AM, poma wrote: >>> On 10.05.2015 12:38, poma wrote: On 08.05.2015 12:59, poma wrote: > On 08.05.2015 12:20, poma wrote: >> >> [0.00] Linux version 4.0.2-200.fc21.x86_64

Re: dvb_usb_af9015: command failed=1 _ kernel >= 4.1.x

2015-05-12 Thread Antti Palosaari
On 05/11/2015 09:43 PM, poma wrote: On 05/11/2015 12:25 AM, poma wrote: On 10.05.2015 12:38, poma wrote: On 08.05.2015 12:59, poma wrote: On 08.05.2015 12:20, poma wrote: [0.00] Linux version 4.0.2-200.fc21.x86_64 ... [0.870875] usb 1-2: new high-speed USB device number 2 using

Re: dvb_usb_af9015: command failed=1 _ kernel >= 4.1.x

2015-05-11 Thread poma
On 05/11/2015 12:25 AM, poma wrote: > On 10.05.2015 12:38, poma wrote: >> On 08.05.2015 12:59, poma wrote: >>> On 08.05.2015 12:20, poma wrote: [0.00] Linux version 4.0.2-200.fc21.x86_64 ... [0.870875] usb 1-2: new high-speed USB device number 2 using ehci-pci [