Re: v4l-utils migrated to autotools

2012-01-18 Thread Theodore Kilgore
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em 18-01-2012 11:02, Gregor Jasny escreveu: > > On 1/18/12 1:54 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > >> Em 18-01-2012 10:47, Gregor Jasny escreveu: > >>> On 1/18/12 1:19 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > It would be nice to write at the INS

Re: v4l-utils migrated to autotools

2012-01-18 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em 18-01-2012 11:02, Gregor Jasny escreveu: > On 1/18/12 1:54 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >> Em 18-01-2012 10:47, Gregor Jasny escreveu: >>> On 1/18/12 1:19 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: It would be nice to write at the INSTALL what dependencies are needed for the autotools to wor

Re: v4l-utils migrated to autotools

2012-01-18 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:44:09 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote: > I love cmake and can't understand why people are not preferring it over > autotools for user-space applications and conditional+configurable > builds. In my experience, cmake sucks at cross-compilation. It is also rather lim

Re: v4l-utils migrated to autotools

2012-01-18 Thread Gregor Jasny
On 1/18/12 1:54 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Em 18-01-2012 10:47, Gregor Jasny escreveu: On 1/18/12 1:19 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: It would be nice to write at the INSTALL what dependencies are needed for the autotools to work, or, alternatively, to commit the files generated by the

Re: v4l-utils migrated to autotools

2012-01-18 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:43:21 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em 18-01-2012 10:31, Rémi Denis-Courmont escreveu: >> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:19:24 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab >> wrote: >>> Not sure if it is possible, but it would be great if the build output >>> would be less verbose. l

Re: v4l-utils migrated to autotools

2012-01-18 Thread Gregor Jasny
On 1/18/12 1:44 PM, Patrick Boettcher wrote: I missed the first message of this thread, that's why I hijacked it here and it is short: I love cmake and can't understand why people are not preferring it over autotools for user-space applications and conditional+configurable builds. I hope my mai

Re: v4l-utils migrated to autotools

2012-01-18 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em 18-01-2012 10:47, Gregor Jasny escreveu: > On 1/18/12 1:19 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >> It would be nice to write at the INSTALL what dependencies are needed for >> the autotools to work, or, alternatively, to commit the files generated >> by the autoreconf -vfi magic spell there [1]. >

Re: v4l-utils migrated to autotools

2012-01-18 Thread Gregor Jasny
On 1/18/12 1:19 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: It would be nice to write at the INSTALL what dependencies are needed for the autotools to work, or, alternatively, to commit the files generated by the autoreconf -vfi magic spell there [1]. The end user gets a tarball created with "make dist" w

Re: v4l-utils migrated to autotools

2012-01-18 Thread Patrick Boettcher
On Wednesday 18 January 2012 13:31:01 Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:19:24 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab > > wrote: > > Not sure if it is possible, but it would be great if the build > > output would be less verbose. libtool adds a lot of additional > > (generally > > useless

Re: v4l-utils migrated to autotools

2012-01-18 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em 18-01-2012 10:31, Rémi Denis-Courmont escreveu: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:19:24 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab > wrote: >> Not sure if it is possible, but it would be great if the build output >> would be less verbose. libtool adds a lot of additional (generally > useless) >> messages, with makes

Re: v4l-utils migrated to autotools

2012-01-18 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:19:24 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Not sure if it is possible, but it would be great if the build output > would be less verbose. libtool adds a lot of additional (generally useless) > messages, with makes harder to see the compilation warnings in the > middle

Re: v4l-utils migrated to autotools

2012-01-18 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em 15-01-2012 19:37, Gregor Jasny escreveu: > Hello, > > I'm Gregor the Debian (and thus Ubuntu) Maintainer of v4l-utils. I took > the challenge to convert the Makefile based build system into an > autotools one. This weekend I polished the last bits and submitted my > changes. > > If you build v

Re: v4l-utils migrated to autotools

2012-01-17 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 01/15/2012 10:37 PM, Gregor Jasny wrote: Hello, I'm Gregor the Debian (and thus Ubuntu) Maintainer of v4l-utils. I took the challenge to convert the Makefile based build system into an autotools one. This weekend I polished the last bits and submitted my changes. If you build v4l-utils

v4l-utils migrated to autotools

2012-01-15 Thread Gregor Jasny
Hello, I'm Gregor the Debian (and thus Ubuntu) Maintainer of v4l-utils. I took the challenge to convert the Makefile based build system into an autotools one. This weekend I polished the last bits and submitted my changes. If you build v4l-utils from source, please clean your tree via "git clean"