On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 18-01-2012 11:02, Gregor Jasny escreveu:
> > On 1/18/12 1:54 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >> Em 18-01-2012 10:47, Gregor Jasny escreveu:
> >>> On 1/18/12 1:19 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> It would be nice to write at the INS
Em 18-01-2012 11:02, Gregor Jasny escreveu:
> On 1/18/12 1:54 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Em 18-01-2012 10:47, Gregor Jasny escreveu:
>>> On 1/18/12 1:19 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
It would be nice to write at the INSTALL what dependencies are needed for
the autotools to wor
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:44:09 +0100, Patrick Boettcher
wrote:
> I love cmake and can't understand why people are not preferring it over
> autotools for user-space applications and conditional+configurable
> builds.
In my experience, cmake sucks at cross-compilation. It is also rather
lim
On 1/18/12 1:54 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 18-01-2012 10:47, Gregor Jasny escreveu:
On 1/18/12 1:19 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
It would be nice to write at the INSTALL what dependencies are needed for
the autotools to work, or, alternatively, to commit the files generated
by the
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:43:21 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
> Em 18-01-2012 10:31, Rémi Denis-Courmont escreveu:
>> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:19:24 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
>> wrote:
>>> Not sure if it is possible, but it would be great if the build output
>>> would be less verbose. l
On 1/18/12 1:44 PM, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
I missed the first message of this thread, that's why I hijacked it here
and it is short:
I love cmake and can't understand why people are not preferring it over
autotools for user-space applications and conditional+configurable
builds.
I hope my mai
Em 18-01-2012 10:47, Gregor Jasny escreveu:
> On 1/18/12 1:19 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> It would be nice to write at the INSTALL what dependencies are needed for
>> the autotools to work, or, alternatively, to commit the files generated
>> by the autoreconf -vfi magic spell there [1].
>
On 1/18/12 1:19 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
It would be nice to write at the INSTALL what dependencies are needed for
the autotools to work, or, alternatively, to commit the files generated
by the autoreconf -vfi magic spell there [1].
The end user gets a tarball created with "make dist" w
On Wednesday 18 January 2012 13:31:01 Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:19:24 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
>
> wrote:
> > Not sure if it is possible, but it would be great if the build
> > output would be less verbose. libtool adds a lot of additional
> > (generally
>
> useless
Em 18-01-2012 10:31, Rémi Denis-Courmont escreveu:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:19:24 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> wrote:
>> Not sure if it is possible, but it would be great if the build output
>> would be less verbose. libtool adds a lot of additional (generally
> useless)
>> messages, with makes
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:19:24 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
> Not sure if it is possible, but it would be great if the build output
> would be less verbose. libtool adds a lot of additional (generally
useless)
> messages, with makes harder to see the compilation warnings in the
> middle
Em 15-01-2012 19:37, Gregor Jasny escreveu:
> Hello,
>
> I'm Gregor the Debian (and thus Ubuntu) Maintainer of v4l-utils. I took
> the challenge to convert the Makefile based build system into an
> autotools one. This weekend I polished the last bits and submitted my
> changes.
>
> If you build v
Hi,
On 01/15/2012 10:37 PM, Gregor Jasny wrote:
Hello,
I'm Gregor the Debian (and thus Ubuntu) Maintainer of v4l-utils. I took
the challenge to convert the Makefile based build system into an
autotools one. This weekend I polished the last bits and submitted my
changes.
If you build v4l-utils
Hello,
I'm Gregor the Debian (and thus Ubuntu) Maintainer of v4l-utils. I took
the challenge to convert the Makefile based build system into an
autotools one. This weekend I polished the last bits and submitted my
changes.
If you build v4l-utils from source, please clean your tree via "git
clean"
14 matches
Mail list logo